NASHUA, NH —
OSHA Inspection: PEDRO ZARUNA
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of PEDRO ZARUNA in 1 PADDINGTON PLACE, NASHUA, NH 03060 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345289201.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PEDRO ZARUNA
- Site address
- 1 PADDINGTON PLACE
- City
- NASHUA
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03060
- Mailing
- 255 WINTER STREET, HYANNIS, MA 02601
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide a competent person to conduct frequent and regular inspections of the workplace.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from fall and scaffold collapse hazards where the employer did not provide for a competent person to supervise the erecting of the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not worn.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.451 B02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2)(i): Each ladder jack scaffold, top plate bracket scaffold, roof bracket scaffold, and pump jack scaffold was not at least 12 inches (30 cm) wide: Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a fall hazard where the wood plank scaffold platform was less than 12 inches in width.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a fall hazard where an extension ladder was not provided to access the ladder jack scaffold platform directly. Employees had to use one of the scaffold support ladders and climb over the scaffold platform for access.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from fall hazard where positioning devices were used instead of personal fall arrest equipment.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 19 feet where fall protection equipment was not utilized.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.452 K05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from fall and scaffold collapse hazards where two ladder jack scaffold platforms were bridged over a common ladder jack and support ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from fall and scaffold collapse hazards where the employer did not provide scaffold training to each employee.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from a roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in NH
CONCORD, NH—2026-07-10
C.C. TOMATOES
FRANCESTOWN, NH—2026-07-10
JM BUILDERS LLC
FRANCESTOWN, NH—2026-07-10
D&D INSULATION, LLC
NORTHFIELD, NH—2026-07-03
JP PEST SERVICES
CONCORD, NH—2026-07-01
REYES CARPENTRY, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345289201.