Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: FOND DU LAC MODEL LAUNDRY COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FOND DU LAC MODEL LAUNDRY COMPANY in 66 S MACY ST., FOND DU LAC, WI 54935 (NAICS 812320). OSHA activity number 345324891.

Watch Fond DU LAC Model Laundry Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fond DU LAC Model Laundry Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
66 S MACY ST.
City
FOND DU LAC
State
WI
ZIP
54935
Mailing
66 S MACY ST., FOND DU LAC, WI 54935
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
812320
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3121.00 · Current $3121.00
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(i):  The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.  A periodic inspection of the energy control procedures and authorized employee was not conducted at least annually.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3121
  • — Z (S) $3121

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A):  Each authorized employee shall receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.  Employees authorized to perform lockout activities or affected employees exposed to the use of energy control procedures were not trained in the application of the hazardous energy control program and procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.147(d):  The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):  On or about May 25, 2021, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with steam when they engaged in servicing activities on the Lavender Utility Press/Unity Press.  The employer did not ensure that employees implemented energy control application steps prior to allowing them to perform servicing.  The machine did not have lockout devices applied to all energy sources prior to the employee engaging in the servicing / maintenance activity.  As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [1910.147(d)(3)], lockout/tagout device application [1910.147(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [1910(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [1910.147(d)(6)] were not implemented to protect employees from machine hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C05 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3121.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(5)(ii):  Lockout devices and tagout devices shall be singularly identified; shall be the only devices(s) used for controlling energy; shall not be used for other purposes; and shall meet the following requirements:  Tagout devices were utilized on electrical disconnect in which the equipment had been permanently removed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3121

1910.176 G

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2340.00 · Current $2340.00
29 CFR  1910.176(g):  Guarding. Covers and/or guard- rails shall be provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc.  In the basement, the pits/trough carrying used water from the washing machines did not have covers exposing employees to tripping hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2340
  • — Z (S) $2340

1910.212 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3121.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1):  Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.  (a)  On the first floor, the Flat Ironer, American Laundry Machinery Industries (S/N:  155-M-3390) did not have guarding provided to prevent the operator, who is feeding into or receiving from the ironer, from reaching hazardous nip points, or accidentally contacting the uncovered heated surface, or both.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3121

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3121.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.219(c)(4)(i):  Projecting shaft ends shall present a smooth edge and end and shall not project more than one-half the diameter of the shaft unless guarded by nonrotating caps or safety sleeves.  On the first floor, the Cissell Dryer had an extended projecting shaft with a 1 1/4" diameter which was not smooth and projected 1 1/4" exposing employees to entanglement hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3121

1910.264 C04 III A

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3121.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.264(c)(4)(iii)(a):  All steam pipes that are within 7 feet of the floor or working platform, and with which the worker may come into contact, shall be insulated or covered with a heat-resistive material or shall be otherwise properly guarded.  (a)  On the first floor, the steam pipes by the American CCW-C had exposed steam pipes exposing employees to thermal burns due to pipe temperature approximately 316 degrees F.  (b)  On the first floor, the steam pipes by the American Dryer Corp had exposed steam pipes exposing employees to thermal burns due to pipe temperatures approximately 190-203 degrees F.  (c)  On the second floor, the steam pipes by the Cissell Steamer had exposed steam pipes exposing employees to thermal burns due to pipe temperatures approximately 300 degrees F.  (d)  On the second floor, the steam pipes by the Ajax Cuff & Collar (Model:  CCW, S/N:  SPHP2661502) had exposed steam pipes exposing employees to thermal burns due to pipe temperatures approximately 325 degrees F.  (e)  In the basement, the steam pipe with the screw in the hallway near the men's restroom had an exposed steam pipe exposing employees to thermal burns due to pipe temperatures approximately 200 degrees F.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3121

View FOND DU LAC MODEL LAUNDRY COMPANY's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345324891.