Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JESUS HASCO DBA JESUS HASCO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JESUS HASCO DBA JESUS HASCO in 10400 DEER CREEK CHASE, ORLAND PARK, IL 60462 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345446025.

Watch Jesus Hasco DBA Jesus Hasco — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jesus Hasco DBA Jesus Hasco is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10400 DEER CREEK CHASE
City
ORLAND PARK
State
IL
ZIP
60462
Mailing
5225 W. MONTANA ST., CHICAGO, IL 60603
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $349.00 · Current $349.00
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.   a.  On or about July 27, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite, employees had been provided fall protection training, however, the employer failed to keep a written certification of record.  Citation Number          Item Number           Abatement Date 0200112/09/2021
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $349

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a.  On or about July 27, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite, employees using pneumatic nail guns were not wearing safety glasses, thereby exposing employees to hazards associated with eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a.  On or about July 27, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite,  employees performing residential roofing operations, ten (10) feet three (3) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.  b.  On or about July 27, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, eighteen (18) feet nine (9) inch above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a.  On or about July 27, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite, the portable ladder used to access the garage roof did not extend at least three (3) feet above the upper landing surface, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  a.  On or about July 27, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite, employees had been provided fall protection training, however, the employer failed to keep a written certification of record.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345446025.