BUCYRUS, OH —
OSHA Inspection: DEXTER DRIER COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DEXTER DRIER COMPANY in 4933 STETZER ROAD, BUCYRUS, OH 44820 (NAICS 423830). OSHA activity number 345471031.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DEXTER DRIER COMPANY
- Site address
- 4933 STETZER ROAD
- City
- BUCYRUS
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44820
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 1016 ATTN: DAN NAUFZINGER, BUCYRUS, OH 44820
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423830
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 B05 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3108.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
00400440108016752460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): The spraying operations was not designed, installed and maintained such that the average air velocity over the open face of the booth (or booth cross section during spraying operations) was not less than 100 linear feet per minute. Visible gauges or audible alarm or pressure activated devices were not installed to indicate or insure that the required air velocity was maintained. On or about August 11, 2021, the employer did not ensure that the spray booth was maintained in a manner to ensure the average air velocity over the open face of the booth was not less than 100 linear feet per minute (fpm) in that average air velocity when an employee was spraying wheel rims was 53.2 fpm. The visible gauge on the side the booth was not functional to allow employees to check that air velocity was maintained at the proper level.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3108
- — Z (S) $3108
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3108.00 · Current $2331.00 Reduced
00400440108016752460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about August 11, 2021, the employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear tight fitting air purifying respirators when spray painting vehicles and vehicle parts. Employees were exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to acetone, xylene, ethylbenzene, n-butyl acetate, toluene and heptan-2-one which are included in PPG epoxy primer, PPG epoxy hardener, PPG Factory Packblack, PPG corrosion resistant primer, and PPG CRE epoxy hardener.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2331
- — C (S) $3108
- — Z (S) $3108
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
00400440108016752460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: On or about August 11, 2021, the employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards for employees exposed to hazards associated with chemicals such as, but not limited to acetone, xylene, ethylbenzene, n-butyl acetate, toluene and heptan-2-one which are included in PPG epoxy primer, PPG epoxy hardener, PPG Factory Packblack, PPG corrosion resistant primer, and PPG CRE epoxy hardener.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about August 11, 2021, the employer did not provide medical evaluations to determine the employees ability to use a respirator for employees required to wear tight fitting air purifying respirators for work such as spray painting. Note: The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
00400440108016752460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about August 11, 2021, the employer did not ensure employees required to wear tight fitting air purifying respirators when spray painting were fit tested prior to the initial use of the respirator. Employees were exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to acetone, xylene, ethylbenzene, n-butyl acetate, toluene and heptan-2-one which are included in PPG epoxy primer, PPG epoxy hardener, PPG Factory Packblack, PPG corrosion resistant primer, and PPG CRE epoxy hardener.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
00400440108016752460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii): On or about August 11, 2021, the employer did not provide employees with effective training on how improper fit, usage or maintenance can compromise the protective effects of a respirator, how to inspect the respirator, put on and remove the respirator, check the seal of the respirator, procedure for storage of the respirator, and how to recognize medical signs and symptoms preventing effective use of respirators. The employer required employees to wear half faced tight fitting air purifying respirators while spray painting.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3108.00 · Current $2331.00 Reduced
00400440108016752460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about August 11, 2021, the employer did not develop and implement the elements of a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to acetone, xylene, ethylbenzene, n-butyl acetate, toluene, heptan-2-one and silica which are included in PPG epoxy primer, PPG epoxy hardener, PPG Factory Packblack, PPG corrosion resistant primer, and PPG CRE epoxy hardener and Essix Resources crystalline silica. Employees were exposed to inhalation and contact hazards that could result in health effects such as, but not limited to irritation of the respiratory tract, depression or damage to the central nervous system, skin irritation, eye irritation, dizziness and cancer.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2331
- — C (S) $3108
- — Z (S) $3108
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
00400440108016752460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet. On or about August 11, 2021, the employer had not established a list of hazardous chemicals present at the facility such as but not limited to PPG epoxy primer, PPG epoxy hardener, PPG Factory Packblack, PPG corrosion resistant primer, and PPG CRE epoxy hardener and Essix Resources crystalline silica.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
00400440108016752460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use. On or about August 11, 2021, the employer had not obtained safety data sheets for each of the hazardous chemicals in the workplace such as, but not limited to acetone, xylene, ethylbenzene, n-butyl acetate, toluene, heptan-2-one and silica which are included in PPG epoxy primer, PPG epoxy hardener, PPG Factory Packblack, PPG corrosion resistant primer, and PPG CRE epoxy hardener and Essix Resources crystalline silica.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
00400440108016752460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about August 11, 2021, the employer had not implemented an effective training program for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to acetone, xylene, ethylbenzene, n-butyl acetate, toluene, heptan-2-one and silica which are included in PPG epoxy primer, PPG epoxy hardener, PPG Factory Packblack, PPG corrosion resistant primer, and PPG CRE epoxy hardener and Essix Resources crystalline silica. Training should cover the written hazard communication program, health hazards associated with the chemicals in the workplace, methods to detect the release of a hazardous chemicals, measures employees can take to protect themselves from exposure to the chemicals and safety data sheets including where employees can access them.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 D01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(1): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(3) of this section: On or about August 11, 2021, the employer did not assess employee exposure to crystalline silica during abrasive blasting operations when employees blast items such as, but not limited to snow plows and automotive parts using Essix Resources crystalline silica.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423830)
ARLINGTON, WA—2026-07-14
WA317991786 - OLYMPIC EQUIPMENT LLC
CLOVERDALE, VA—2026-07-10
CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE
MOUNT BRADDOCK, PA—2026-07-01
HAZEMAG USA INC
CALEDONIA, MI—2026-07-01
TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY OF MICHIGAN LLC
FRESNO, CA—2026-06-30
WHOLESALE EQUIPMENT OF FRESNO, INC.
More inspections in OH
WELLINGTON, OH—2026-07-16
WHIRLAWAY CORPORATION
WAUSEON, OH—2026-07-16
WATSON WELL DRILLING INC.
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
STONEY ACRES BUILDERS LLC
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
GRB ENTERPRISES LLC
CHILLICOTHE, OH—2026-07-15
KENWORTH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345471031.