WOLCOTT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ENRIQUE MARTINEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ENRIQUE MARTINEZ in 1395 MERIDEN ROAD, WOLCOTT, CT 06716 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 345506240.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ENRIQUE MARTINEZ
- Site address
- 1395 MERIDEN ROAD
- City
- WOLCOTT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06716
- Mailing
- PO BOX 2344, WHITEVILLE, NC 28472
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $329.00 · Current $329.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 1395 Meriden Road, Wolcott, Connecticut Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 4a and Citation 001, Item 4b with a final order date of 10/27/2021 was not received within 10 calendar days ( by 10/30/2021) following the abatement due date (10/20/2021).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $329
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were working on the low sloped roof at a height above 6 feet were protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems or a monitoring system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2341.00 · Current $2341.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees used a stepladder in a manner for which it was designed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2341
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3511.00 · Current $3511.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step. Worksite: The employer did not supply an adequate length step ladder for the employees who were required to access the roof. Employees were made to step on the very top of the 8 foot stepladder in order to reach the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3511
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work on the roof at a height above 6 feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use a ladder that was not an adequate length to reach the roof were trained to recognize the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at ENRIQUE MARTINEZ
DAWSONVILLE, GA—2025-02-07
ENRIQUE MARTINEZ
HOOVER, AL—2012-08-02 00:00:00
ENRIQUE MARTINEZ
View ENRIQUE MARTINEZ's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
GARDENDALE, AL—2026-07-09
ANDINO'S IRON WORKERS, LLC
MIDLOTHIAN, VA—2026-07-09
B & J STEEL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
LYNCHBURG, VA—2026-07-09
GRAY'S WELDING LLC
CHESAPEAKE, VA—2026-07-08
MODERN STEEL AND STAIR LLC
YAKIMA, WA—2026-07-07
WA317991949 - H & A STEEL ERECTORS LLC
More inspections in CT
BRIDGEPORT, CT—2026-07-10
WRR, INC.
BERLIN, CT—2026-07-10
MMF CONSTRUCTION LLC
NAUGATUCK, CT—2026-07-08
WHITING-TURNER LCT2 JOINT VENTURE
SOMERS, CT—2026-07-08
F&G RECYCLING LLC
STAMFORD, CT—2026-07-07
FAIRFIELD AVENUE MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345506240.