Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HUGO DOROTEO FRAMING SERVICES LLC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of HUGO DOROTEO FRAMING SERVICES LLC in BLD #27, UNITS 191-198, JOSSLYN LN., JACKSONVILLE, FL 32226 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345590954.

Watch Hugo Doroteo Framing Services LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hugo Doroteo Framing Services LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
BLD #27, UNITS 191-198, JOSSLYN LN.
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32226
Mailing
2822 STANWOOD AVE., JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2341.00 · Current $1405.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee use appropriate eye / face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a.  At building #27, Units 191-198, Josslyn Lane, Jacksonville, FL: On or about 10/20/2021, the employer exposed employees to eye injuries by flying debris, in that two employees using pneumatic nail guns were not wearing safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1404.6
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $1756.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   a.  At building #27, Units 191-198, Josslyn Lane, Jacksonville, FL: On or about 10/20/2021, the employer exposed employees to a 10-feet 5-inch fall hazard to the concrete slab below, in that fall protection was not utilized by employees while securing floor joists when walking/standing on the floor joists.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1755.6
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2341.00 · Current $1405.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  a.  At building #27, Units 191-198, Josslyn Lane, Jacksonville, FL: On or about 10/20/2021, the employer exposed employees to a 10 feet fall hazard, in that the Werner Aluminum extension ladder used by employees to access the upper level did not extend at least 3-feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1404.6
  • — Z (S) $2341

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345590954.