OSHA Inspection: ROSZMAN ROOFING AND REMODELING INC

Issued

2022-01-13 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $5461.00 · Current $2730.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) Roszman Roofing and Remodeling LLC. On or about December 08, 2021, at the site location of 153 Laquineo St. Findlay, OH: The employer did not ensure the use of fall protection during residential roofing activities. Employees operating in this condition were exposed to falls over 25 feet to the concrete surface below.

Issued

2022-01-13 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3901.00 · Current $1950.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a) Roszman Roofing and Remodeling LLC. On or about December 08, 2021, at the site location of 153 Laquineo St. Findlay, OH: The employer did not provide head protection to employees tasked with clean-up duties below other employees performing roofing work above. Employees working in this condition were exposed to struck by hazards.

Issued

2022-01-13 00:00:00

Abate by

2022-02-01 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3901.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a) Roszman Roofing and Remodeling LLC. On or about December 08, 2021, at the site location of 153 Laquineo St. Findlay, OH: The employer did not require the use of any form of eye protection when using pneumatic nail guns during roofing activities. Employees in this condition were exposed to eye injuries.