Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PRESTIGE COMPANION & HOMEMAKERS LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PRESTIGE COMPANION & HOMEMAKERS LLC in 77 MAIN STREET NORTH SUITE 100, SOUTHBURY, CT 06488 (NAICS 621610). OSHA activity number 345729313.

Watch Prestige Companion & Homemakers LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Prestige Companion & Homemakers LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
77 MAIN STREET NORTH SUITE 100
City
SOUTHBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06488
Mailing
77 MAIN STREET NORTH SUITE 100, SOUTHBURY, CT 06488
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621610
Employees
115
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 A02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13052.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(a)(2): The employer did not provide respirators which were applicable and suitable for the purpose intended:   Jobsite/client residence:  On or about May 2, 2022, employees who came into close contact while transporting, bathing, changing clothes, and moving from the bed to wheelchair to a COVID-19 positive client were not provided appropriate respiratory protection from the virus. At a minimum, a N95 NIOSH-certified filtering facepiece respirator is necessary to protect employees from aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $13052

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $9136.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.  Jobsite:  On or about May 2, 2022  and thereafter, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures for respirator use that included all provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix).  The employer required employees to wear respirators while exposed to confirmed positive COVID-19 residents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9136.4
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):   Jobsite: The employer did not verify through a written certification that a hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345729313.