NEW BRITAIN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: STANDARD MANUFACTURING CO. LLC
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of STANDARD MANUFACTURING CO. LLC in 100 BURRITT STREET, NEW BRITAIN, CT 06053 (NAICS 332994). OSHA activity number 345774921.
Watch Standard Manufacturing CO. LLC — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Standard Manufacturing CO. LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STANDARD MANUFACTURING CO. LLC
- Site address
- 100 BURRITT STREET
- City
- NEW BRITAIN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06053
- Mailing
- 100 BURRITT STREET, NEW BRITAIN, CT 06053
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332994
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5801.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: FIRING ROOMS: On or about February 10, 2022, the employer had not provided employees who were required to wear respirators with annual medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5801
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5801.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and at least annually thereafter. FIRING ROOMS: On or about February 10, 2022, the employer did not provide respirator fit testing for employees who were required to wear tight-fitting half-face respirators while test firing guns.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5801
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $5801.00 · Current $4750.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2):Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: On or about February 10, 2022 in the New Firing Room, a Pelonis portable heater fan had been disassembled and mounted inside a plywood box.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4750
- — Z (S) $5801
1910.304 B04 II B
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $5801.00 · Current $4750.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(b)(4)(ii)(B):Where connected to a branch circuit supplying two or more receptacles or outlets, a receptacle supplied a total cord- and plug-connected load in excess of the maximum specified in Table S-4: NEW FIRING ROOM: On or about February 10, 2022, a Pelonis Model PSH700S Portable Heater Fan was plugged into a relocatable power tap. The heater draws 12.5 amps when operating. The relocatable power tap was rated for 15 Amps and therefore the maximum load allowed is 12 Amps according to Table S-1.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4750
- — Z (S) $5801
1910.305 G01 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5801.00 · Current $4750.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv): Flexible cords and/ or cables were used for purposes prohibited by paragraphs (A) through (F) of 29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv). a. On or about February 10, 2022, two 12-inch Vevor portable fans used in the Old Firing Room for exhaust ventilation were energized using extension cords in lieu of fixed wiring. b. On or about February 10, 2022 in the New Firing Room, the manufacturer-supplied power cord for a Pelonis portable heater fan was too short to reach the nearest electric outlet and therefore a relocatable power tap was used as an extension cord in lieu of fixed wiring. c. On or about February 10, 2022 throughout the Production Areas, Lasko box fans were mounted to frames that also supported four pleated air filters. The fans were plugged into extension cords in lieu of fixed wiring. In addition, the extension cords were zip-tied to the ceiling.
Recent events (3)
- — I (S) $4750
- — P (S) $4750
- — Z (S) $5801
1910.1025 F02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $8702.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(2)(i):The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii)), and (f) through (m) for each employee required by 29 CFR 1910.1025 to use a respirator: FIRING ROOMS: On or about February 10, 2022, the employer had not implemented all elements of a respiratory protection program in that they had not provided annual fit testing for employees who were required to wear tight-fitting respirators while test firing guns.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $8702
1910.1025 D02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5801.00 · Current $4750.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: COMPANY-WIDE: On or about February 10, 2022, the employer had not conducted sampling to determine employee exposure to lead.
Recent events (3)
- — I (S) $4750
- — P (S) $4750
- — Z (S) $5801
1910.1025 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7252.00 · Current $4750.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: On or about February 10, 2022, the employer did not ensure that surfaces in the firing rooms and production areas were cleaned regularly to minimize lead accumulation.
Recent events (3)
- — I (S) $4750
- — P (S) $4750
- — Z (S) $7252
1910.1025 J01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $10151.00 · Current $4750.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): A medical surveillance program was not instituted for all employee(s) who were, or could be exposed to lead above the action level for more that thirty days per year: PRODUCTION AREAS and FIRING ROOMS: On or about February 10, 2022, the employer had not developed a medical surveillance program to monitor lead exposure of employees who may be exposed to lead at concentrations above the action level of 30 micrograms of lead/cubic meter of air (ug/m3).
Recent events (3)
- — I (S) $4750
- — P (S) $4750
- — Z (S) $10151
1910.1025 J02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(2)(i): The employer did not make available biological monitoring, including blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels for each employee covered under 29 CFR 1910.1025 (j)(1)(i): PRODUCTION AREAS and FIRING ROOMS: On or about February 10, 2022, the employer had not provided employees exposed to lead with blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels to monitor lead exposure of employees who may be exposed to lead at concentrations above the action level of 30 micrograms of lead/cubic meter of air (ug/m3).
Recent events (3)
- — I (S) $0
- — P (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 L01 I
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $7252.00 · Current $4750.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025: PRODUCTION AREAS and FIRING ROOMS: On or about February 10, 2022, employees who were exposed to lead while test firing guns and/or handling guns that had been fired were not provided training on the hazards of occupational exposure to lead and the requirements of this standard as outlined in Appendices A and B.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4750
- — Z (S) $7252
1910.1025 M01 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4351.00 · Current $4750.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(iii): The employer did not include lead in the hazard communication program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (1910.1200). COMPANY-WIDE: On or about February 10, 2022, the employer's written Hazard Communication Program did not address the hazards of lead.
Recent events (3)
- — I (S) $4750
- — P (S) $4750
- — Z (S) $4351
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet. COMPANY-WIDE: On or about February 10, 2022, the employer's written Hazard Communication Program did not include a list of hazardous chemicals that were known to be present at the workplace. In particular, as a gun manufacturer, the employees were exposed to lead when test firing guns, disassembling and reassembling guns that had been fired, and cleaning the firing rooms.
Recent events (3)
- — I (S) $0
- — P (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332994)
MARYVILLE, TN—2026-07-07
SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC.
RAPID CITY, SD—2026-06-17
JACK FIRST, INC.
LOUISVILLE, CO—2026-05-21
MAGPUL INDUSTRIES CORP.
WATERTOWN, WI—2026-03-19
HEARING PROTECTION, LLC
WEST VALLEY CITY, UT—2026-03-11
DESERT TECH
More inspections in CT
ENFIELD, CT—2026-07-16
MOMS ENFIELD
DAYVILLE, CT—2026-07-16
HARBOR FREIGHT
NEW BRITAIN, CT—2026-07-14
JANANII, LLC
NEWINGTON, CT—2026-07-14
TRUSS MANUFACTURING INC
NORTH BRANFORD, CT—2026-07-14
NYK STATEWIDE MOLINA CONSTRUCTION LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345774921.