Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MATTHEW LECK

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of MATTHEW LECK in 165 GATEHOUSE RD, SANFORD, ME 04073 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 345865042.

Watch Matthew Leck — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Matthew Leck is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MATTHEW LECK
Site address
165 GATEHOUSE RD
City
SANFORD
State
ME
ZIP
04073
Mailing
PO BOX 494, SHAPLEIGH, ME 04076
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $1554.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   Establishment - The employer required employees to wear tight fitting, 3M half-face respirators for painting operations without creating and maintaining a respirator program that addressed the selection, training, medical evaluation and fit testing prior to their use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1554
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   Establishment - The employer did not provide employee(s) with a medical evaluation prior to required use of tight-fitting, 3M half-face respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   Establishment - The employer did not ensure that employees using tight fitting, 3M half face respirators were fit tested prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  Old Paint Room  - The employer did not ensure workers removed facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the respirator and the face when using required tight-fitting, 3M half faced respirators and applying primer and paint during pray operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $2176.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   Establishment - The employer did not develop or maintain a written hazard communication program addressing how labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, information and training will be met while exposing employees to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to KEM BOND� HS High Solids Alkyd Universal Metal Primer, PRO INDUSTRIAL Acrylic - Semi-Gloss, and PRO INDUSTRIAL Waterborne Acrylic Dryfall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2175.5
  • — Z (S) $4351

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1)(i):The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.  Establishment - The employer did not compile a list of hazardous chemicals used by employees such as but not limited to KEM BOND� HS High Solids Alkyd Universal Metal Primer, PRO INDUSTRIAL Acrylic - Semi-Gloss, and PRO INDUSTRIAL Waterborne Acrylic Dryfall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Establishment - The employer did not provide effective information or training to employees who used hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to KEM BOND� HS High Solids Alkyd Universal Metal Primer, PRO INDUSTRIAL Acrylic - Semi-Gloss, and PRO INDUSTRIAL Waterborne Acrylic Dryfall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345865042.