Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: KARAM RESTORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KARAM RESTORATION in MCCANDLESS & BUTLER STREETS, PITTSBURGH, PA 15201 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 345934939.

Watch Karam Restoration — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Karam Restoration is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KARAM RESTORATION
Site address
MCCANDLESS & BUTLER STREETS
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15201
Mailing
1523 PACIFIC AVENUE, NATRONA HEIGHTS, PA 15065
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1153 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $2700.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(d)(1):  The employer shall ensure that no employee is exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air calculated as an 8-hour TWA:   a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - An employee designated as a laborer was exposed to silica at a time weighted average exposure of 113.2 micrograms per cubic meter of air while cutting brick.  This level is 2.26 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air as a time weighted average concentration.  Sampling was performed by an OSHA compliance officer on May 4, 2022 for 26 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled portion of the shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:   a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to silica at or above the action level.  An employee designated as a laborer was exposed to silica at a time weighted average exposure of 113.2 micrograms per cubic meter of air while cutting brick.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 D03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(d)(3)(i): The employer did not use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible:   a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - The employer did not use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to silica below the PEL.   An employee designated as a laborer was exposed to silica at a time weighted average exposure of 113.2 micrograms per cubic meter of air while cutting brick.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 E02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(e)(2): Where respirator use is required by this section, the employer did not institute a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134:     a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - The employer did not institute a respiratory protection program and all of its required elements when employees are required to use respirator in the workplace due to silica exposures which are above the permissible exposure limit.    An employee designated as a laborer was exposed to silica at a time weighted average exposure of 113.2 micrograms per cubic meter of air while cutting brick.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use (Construction Reference 1926.103):   a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures when respirators were required in the workplace due to silica exposures which are above the permissible exposure limit.    An employee designated as a laborer was exposed to silica at a time weighted average exposure of 113.2 micrograms per cubic meter of air while cutting brick.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103):   a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator prior to the employee being required to use a respirator in the workplace due to silica exposures which are above the permissible exposure limit.    An employee designated as a laborer was exposed to silica at a time weighted average exposure of 113.2 micrograms per cubic meter of air while cutting brick.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (Construction Reference 1926.103):  a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - The employer did not provide a fit test to employees who use a tight-fitting respirator prior to the initial use of that respirator.    An employee designated as a laborer was exposed to silica at a time weighted average exposure of 113.2 micrograms per cubic meter of air while cutting brick.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace (Construction Reference 1926.103):   a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - The employer did not provide respirator training to employees prior to requiring the employee use the respirator at the work place.   An employee designated as a laborer was exposed to silica at a time weighted average exposure of 113.2 micrograms per cubic meter of air while cutting brick.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $1900.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(g)(1): The employer shall establish and implement a written exposure control plan for employee exposure to silica:     a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plant for employee exposure to silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1900
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $1900.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59):   a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - The employer did not develop, implement and/or maintain a written hazard communication program at the workplace.  Employee work with hazardous materials including but not limited to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1900
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area (Construction Reference: 1926.59):   a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - The employer did not provide information and training to employees on the hazardous materials in their work areas including but not limited to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 I01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(i)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee is trained in accordance with the provisions of the Hazard Communication Standard and paragraph (i)(2) of the silica in construction standard:    a) McCandless & Butler Streets, Pittsburgh, PA, on or about May 4, 2022 - The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained in accordance with the hazard communication standard and the silica in construction standard on the hazards of respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345934939.