Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: POPPLE RIVER CONSTRUCTION LLP

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of POPPLE RIVER CONSTRUCTION LLP in 25793 COUNTY HWY S, CADOTT, WI 54727 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345967962.

Watch Popple River Construction LLP — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Popple River Construction LLP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
25793 COUNTY HWY S
City
CADOTT
State
WI
ZIP
54727
Mailing
W5718 KINGTON ROAD, GREENWOOD, WI 54437
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2486.00 · Current $1616.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section 5(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to tipping and crushed by hazards when working from an unapproved work platform that was supported by a rough-terrain fork lift:  (a) Manufacturer approval was not received before a Gehl rough-terrain forklift was used to lift personnel with a 24 foot wide basket (fork attachment), so information plate(s) and/or load capacity charts specific to the work platform were not available.  (b) East side of postframe building; A means of securely attaching the work platform to prevent it from pivoting or moving was not used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1615.9
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1865.00 · Current $1212.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact:  (a) Throughout the site; Eye protection was not worn while employees used cordless circular and reciprocating (sawsall) saws to cut boards during framing operations.  (b) Throughout the site; Head protection was not worn by workers on the ground while overhead work of installing wooden purlins was performed from atop the structure during framing operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1212.25
  • — Z (S) $1865

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2486.00 · Current $1616.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:  (a) East side of building; A means of access was not provided for getting on an elevated work platform during framing activities of installing trim around and girts above a door opening, so a worker climbed the wall girts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1615.9
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:  (a) North side of building; A means of access was not provided for getting from ground level to where purlins were being installed on top of roof trusses during framing activities, so workers climbed the wall girts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $2020.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e):  (a) East side of postframe building; A means of fall restraint or fall protection systems were not worn while performing work from a Genie brand aerial lift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2020.2
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $2828.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.   (a) North side of postframe building; A means of fall protection was not used during framing activities while workers stood on wall top plates, roof trusses, and purlins at heights greater than 10 feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2828.15
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   (a) North side of postframe building; Fall protection training was not provided for each employee before they were exposed to fall hazards during framing operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345967962.