1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: ALLNEX USA, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ALLNEX USA, INC. in 2904 MISSOURI AVE, EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL 62205 (NAICS 325211). OSHA activity number 346067549.

Watch Allnex USA, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Allnex USA, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALLNEX USA, INC.
Site address
2904 MISSOURI AVE
City
EAST SAINT LOUIS
State
IL
ZIP
62205
Mailing
2904 MISSOURI AVE, EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL 62205
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325211
Employees
47
Ownership type
A

21 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 I D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 47 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13052.00 · Current $10442.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(D):  The employer did not maintain an accurate listing of the location, function, and inspection information for all Relief Valves (RV) within a covered process:  On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not maintain documentation that showed the relief system design and its capabilities to protect the reactor vessel and/or the connected vessels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $10442
  • — Z (S) $13052

1910.119 E03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 47 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13052.00 · Current $10442.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i): The process hazard analysis did not address the hazards of the process:   On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that the PHA identified the hazards of the process involving organic peroxides.  The latest PHA only addressed an overpressure situation could be reached by over-filling the catalyst tank (TK-33) with a pump.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $10442
  • — Z (S) $13052

1910.119 E03 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 47 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13052.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iii): The process hazard analysis did not address engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their interrelationships such as appropriate application of detection methodologies to provide early warning of releases:  On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that the Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) identified any engineering and administrative controls, such as detection methods, to ensure the catalyst tank was approaching any Self Accelerating Decomposition Temperature (SADT) limits, such as temperature and pressure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $13052

1910.119 F01 I B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 47 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13052.00 · Current $10442.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(B): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and did not address normal operations.   On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that the standard operating procedures (SOPs) addressed each step of the operating phase. The SOPs did not address preparation for the next batch while the current resin was in progress inside the reactor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $10442
  • — Z (S) $13052

1910.119 F01 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 47 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(B): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for steps required to correct or avoid deviation from the operating limits in the covered process:   On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that the standard operating procedures (SOPs) addressed consequences of deviation.  Such consequences, include but are not limited to high temperatures due to process upsets, overpressure scenarios from temperature or pressure due to operation parameters and/or operator action such as valve alignment or chemicals out of specifications.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 F01 III A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 47 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(A): Operating procedures did not address properties of, and hazards presented by, the chemicals used in the process:   On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that the standard operating procedures (SOPs) addressed steps to take to avoid upset conditions of the chemicals used in the process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 H02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9324.00 · Current $7459.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not explain the applicable provisions of the emergency action plan to contract employers who work on or adjacent to a covered process:   On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that contractor employees provided by the temporary service were provided hazard training specific to the tasks assigned that involved interaction with the resin manufacturing process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7459
  • — Z (S) $9324

1910.119 O01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 47 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9324.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(1): The employer did not certify that they have evaluated compliance with the provisions of this section at least every three years:   On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that a compliance audit was conducted.  The last compliance audit was conducted on 05/08/2016 and the next audit was due on 09/30/2020.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9324

1910.120 Q01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 37 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13052.00 · Current $13052.00
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations:   On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that an Emergency Response Plan was developed to handle anticipated emergencies associated with chemical spills and releases.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $13052
  • — C (S) $13052
  • — Z (S) $13052

1910.120 Q03 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 37 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13052.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iii): Based on the hazardous substances and/or conditions present, the individual in charge of the ICS did not implement appropriate emergency operations and did not ensure that the personal protective equipment worn was appropriate for the hazards encountered:  On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that appropriate personal protective equipment, such as chemical protective suit, was worn during emergency operations.  Employees were exposed to the hazards of chemicals, including, but not limited to, Organic Peroxide.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $13052
  • — Z (S) $13052

1910.120 Q03 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iv): Employees engaged in emergency response and exposed to hazardous substances presenting an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard, did not wear positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus until such time that the individual in charge of the incident command system determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection would not result in hazardous exposures to employees:  On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) was worn during emergency operations.  Employees were exposed to the potential inhalation hazards of chemicals, including, but not limited to, Organic Peroxide, Styrene, and Toluene Diisocyanate (TDI).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.38 F

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 37 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9324.00 · Current $14502.00
1910.38(f) Review of emergency action plan. An employer must review the emergency action plan with each employee covered by the plan:  On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that employees performing emergency response actions had received a minimum of twenty-four (24) hours of training and were competent in the area of 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A) through (q)(6)(iii)(I).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $14502
  • — C (S) $9324
  • — Z (S) $9324

1910.120 Q06 V

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(v): Incident commanders did not receive at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level and in addition have competency in the areas outline in 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(v)(A) through (q)(6)(v)(F) and/or the employer did not so certify:  On or about 07/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that employees performing incident command functions, during emergency response, had received a minimum of twenty-four (24) hours of training and were competent in the area of 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(v)(A) through (q)(6)(v)(F).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $9324.00 · Current $7459.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about 7/10/2022, employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the ability of employees to use respirators prior to being required to use half and full-face respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7459
  • — Z (S) $9324

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $9324.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting respirator is fit tested prior to initial use, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, make or model) is used, and at least annually thereafter.   On or about 7/10/2022, the employer did not ensure employees using a tight-fitting full and half face respirator were fit tested prior to initial use and at least annually thereafter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9324

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9324.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable, and effective annual training to employees who were required to use respirators.   On or about 7/10/2022, employees were not provided training on the employer's respiratory protection program.  Employees are required to wear full and half face respirators while performing work in the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9324

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 47 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9324.00 · Current $7459.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):  The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)  On or about 7/10/2022, the employer did not ensure Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7459
  • — Z (S) $9324

1910.1200 H02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9324.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not provide information to the employees as to the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, and material safety data sheets required by 29 CFR 1910.1200:  On or about 7/10/2022, the employer did not provide required information to employees such as the location of the Safety Data Sheets or how to access them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9324

1910.134 M01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1047.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(m)(1): Records of medical evaluations required by 29 CFR 1910.134 were not retained and made available in accordance with 1910.1020:  On or about 7/10/2022, the employer did not maintain medical evaluation records for its employees that were required to use respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1047

1910.134 M02 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1047.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(m)(2)(ii): Fit test records were not retained for respirator users until the next fit test was administered:  On or about 7/10/2022, the employer failed to retain respiratory fit test documents for employees required to wear a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1047

1910.1200 G11

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1047.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(11):  Safety data sheets were not made readily available, upon request, to designated representatives, the Assistant Secretary, and the Director, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1020(e)  On or about 7/10/2022, the employer did not make Safety Data Sheets (SDS) available to OSHA upon request.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1047

View ALLNEX USA, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346067549.