Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: KLEVER BENITO NARANJO

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KLEVER BENITO NARANJO in 11 WHITEHALL RD, ROCHESTER, NH 03867 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346079809.

Watch Klever Benito Naranjo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Klever Benito Naranjo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11 WHITEHALL RD
City
ROCHESTER
State
NH
ZIP
03867
Mailing
1404 BRIDGE ST, DRACUT, MA 01826
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $349.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 1c, 2, 4 and 5 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 1, 2022.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $349

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $349.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 2 Item No(s). 3 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 1, 2022.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $349

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)   Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide for inspections of the job site conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof without fall protection were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not required to be worn by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $2200.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:   Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 25 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.     Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder was fully extended and was one rung above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.1053 B09

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and/or bottom of (a) ladder(s) was not kept clear:   Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder were not protected from a fall hazard where multiple air hoses were wrapped around the top of ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3108

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346079809.