ROCHESTER, NH —
OSHA Inspection: KLEVER BENITO NARANJO
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KLEVER BENITO NARANJO in 11 WHITEHALL RD, ROCHESTER, NH 03867 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346079809.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KLEVER BENITO NARANJO
- Site address
- 11 WHITEHALL RD
- City
- ROCHESTER
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03867
- Mailing
- 1404 BRIDGE ST, DRACUT, MA 01826
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $349.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 1c, 2, 4 and 5 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 1, 2022.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $349
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $349.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. 29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 2 Item No(s). 3 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 1, 2022.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $349
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3108.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide for inspections of the job site conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof without fall protection were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3108.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not required to be worn by the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4351.00 · Current $2200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 25 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2200
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3108.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder was fully extended and was one rung above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.1053 B09
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3108.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and/or bottom of (a) ladder(s) was not kept clear: Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder were not protected from a fall hazard where multiple air hoses were wrapped around the top of ladder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3108
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in NH
PORTSMOUTH, NH—2026-07-15
RODAS CONSTRUCTION CORP
DOVER, NH—2026-07-15
KNOX MARSH DEVELOPMENT LLC
DOVER, NH—2026-07-15
REAL PRO BUILDERS CONSTRUCTION INC
MERRIMACK, NH—2026-07-15
BURGER KING
MILFORD, NH—2026-07-15
R G EXTERIORS, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346079809.