Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JONI MADRID

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JONI MADRID in N1641 KAS ST., GREENVILLE, WI 54942 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346098601.

Watch Joni Madrid — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Joni Madrid is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JONI MADRID
Site address
N1641 KAS ST.
City
GREENVILLE
State
WI
ZIP
54942
Mailing
1321 65TH ST APT. C, LUBBOCK, TX 79412
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $388.00 · Current $388.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):  Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  The employer failed to provide certification of abatement for two citations issued on August 22, 2022, with citation 1-1 related to providing required fall protection safety equipment, and citation 2-1 related to providing required fall protection safety training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2486.00 · Current $2486.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  On or about July 13, 2022, at a job site located at N1641 Kas St., in Greenville, Wisconsin; fall protection was not utilized while performing tear off activities on an existing residential house exposing employees to fall hazards over 10 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1):  The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training.  On or about July 13, 2022, at a job site located at N1641 Kas St., in Greenville, Wisconsin; the employer did not certify the fall protection training provided to employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346098601.