Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DREAM HOME CONTRACTING, INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of DREAM HOME CONTRACTING, INC. in 61 HAMILTON AVE, LODI, NJ 07644 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346114762.

Watch Dream Home Contracting, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dream Home Contracting, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
61 HAMILTON AVE
City
LODI
State
NJ
ZIP
07644
Mailing
469 WHITE HORSE HAMILTON SQUARE ROAD, TRENTON, NJ 08610
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.96

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3729.00 · Current $2610.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.96:Safety-toe footwear for employees did not meet the requirements and specifications in American National Standard for Men's Safety-Toe Footwear, Z41.1-1967:  a) 61 Hamilton Ave, Lodi, NJ: CSHOs observed  six construction workers, performing construction duties, without proper footwear. Those six employees wore sneakers  that did not meet the American National Standard for Men's Safety-Toe Footwear requirements, on and about 7/29/2022.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2610.3
  • — Z (S) $3729

1926.150 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $3046.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.150(a)(1): The employer did not develop and maintain a fire protection program to be followed throughout all phases of construction and demolition work, and/or did not provide for the firefighting equipment as specified in this subpart:  a)  61 Hamilton Ave, Lodi, NJ: Employer did not ensure that employees have available firefighting equipment at the jobsite.  The employer did not provide any fire distinguisher at the jobsite. Gas powered compressor  were used at the jobsite.  Extra gasoline to fuel the compressor was stored in gas container at the site, on or about 7/29/21.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3045.7
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $3046.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): An employee was permitted to work in proximity to an electric power circuit that the employee could contact in the course of work and was not protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means:  a) 61 Hamilton Ave. Lodi, NJ - Exterior Roof: Employee were exposed to an electrical hazard while installing shingles on a single family residential home, on or about 7-29-2022.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3045.7
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $3046.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a) 61 Hamilton Ave, Lodi , NJ -Exterior, Roof of the house: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet while engaged in roofing activities on a 6/12 steep roof without means of fall protection in place, on or about 7/29/2022.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3045.7
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $3046.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) 61 Hamilton Ave. Lodi, NJ : Employees were exposed to fall hazards while engaged in roofing activities, the employer did not provide training for each employee potentially exposed to a fall hazard and to enable each employee to recognize the fall hazards, on or about 7-29-2022.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3045.7
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3108.00 · Current $2176.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) 61 Hamilton, Lodi, NJ  Building Exterior: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while transitioning from an extension ladder to the roof of a residential home. The ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface, on or about 7/29/2022.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2175.6
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $3046.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1060(a):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:   (a) 61 Hamilton Ave, Lodi, NJ: Employees were exposed to fall hazard due to lack of ladder hazard recognition training was not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3045.7
  • — Z (S) $4351

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346114762.