STONINGTON, CT —
OSHA Inspection: HOUSE BROS. PLUMBING CONTRACTORS INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HOUSE BROS. PLUMBING CONTRACTORS INC. in 34 ISLAND DRIVE, STONINGTON, CT 06378 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 346126618.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HOUSE BROS. PLUMBING CONTRACTORS INC.
- Site address
- 34 ISLAND DRIVE
- City
- STONINGTON
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06378
- Mailing
- 74 KREIGER LANE, #A, GLASTONBURY, CT 06033
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238220
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4144.00 · Current $2901.00 Reduced
1073P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103). Company Wide: On, or about, June 24, 2022, the employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures for employees performing tasks such as, but not limited to, spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2900.8
- — Z (S) $4144
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1073P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii): (Construction Reference: 1926.103) Company Wide: On, or about, June 24, 2022, the employer did not provide effective respirator training for employees performing tasks such as, but not limited to, spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1073P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference: 1926.103). Company wide: On, or about, June 8, 2022, the employer did not ensure the employee was medical evaluated before using a half face respirator while performing tasks such as (but not limited to) spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1073P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (Construction Reference: 1926.103). Company Wide: On or about, June 8, 2022, the employer did not ensure the employee was fit tested before wearing a half face respirator before performing tasks such as, but not limited to, spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3315.00 · Current $2321.00 Reduced
1073P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) Establishment: On or about June 8, 2022, the employer had not provided effective training on hazardous chemicals for employees performing tasks such as (but not limited to) spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2320.5
- — Z (S) $3315
1926.95 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3315.00 · Current $2321.00 Reduced
1073P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(a):Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided. Jobsite: On or about June 8, 2022, the employer did not provide appropriate chemical resistant gloves to the employee performing tasks such as, but not limited to, spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2320.5
- — Z (S) $3315
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1073P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee use appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors or potentially injurious light radiation. Jobsite: On or about June 8, 2022, the employees were not provided with safety glasses for tasks such as, but not limited to, spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238220)
LOS ANGELES, CA—2026-07-10
PRIME SC MECHANICAL INC.
RICHARDSVILLE, KY—2026-07-10
69312 - SIEGRIST SERVICE COMPANY LLC
PONCE, PR—2026-07-10
WILLIAM ECHEVARR�A ANDINO
MODESTO, CA—2026-07-09
R.L. FULLER, INC.
SAN JOSE, CA—2026-07-09
ROOTER HERO
More inspections in CT
BRIDGEPORT, CT—2026-07-10
WRR, INC.
BERLIN, CT—2026-07-10
MMF CONSTRUCTION LLC
NAUGATUCK, CT—2026-07-08
WHITING-TURNER LCT2 JOINT VENTURE
SOMERS, CT—2026-07-08
F&G RECYCLING LLC
STAMFORD, CT—2026-07-07
FAIRFIELD AVENUE MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346126618.