Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HOUSE BROS. PLUMBING CONTRACTORS INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HOUSE BROS. PLUMBING CONTRACTORS INC. in 34 ISLAND DRIVE, STONINGTON, CT 06378 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 346126618.

Watch House Bros. Plumbing Contractors INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for House Bros. Plumbing Contractors INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
34 ISLAND DRIVE
City
STONINGTON
State
CT
ZIP
06378
Mailing
74 KREIGER LANE, #A, GLASTONBURY, CT 06033
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4144.00 · Current $2901.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1073P125

29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103).  Company Wide:   On, or about, June 24, 2022, the employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures for employees performing tasks such as, but not limited to, spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2900.8
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1073P125

29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii): (Construction Reference: 1926.103)  Company Wide:   On, or about, June 24, 2022, the employer did not provide effective respirator training for employees performing tasks such as, but not limited to, spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1073P125

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference: 1926.103).  Company wide:  On, or about, June 8, 2022, the employer did not ensure the employee was medical evaluated before using a half face respirator while performing tasks such as (but not limited to) spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1073P125

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (Construction Reference: 1926.103).  Company Wide:  On or about, June 8, 2022, the employer did not ensure the employee was fit tested before wearing a half face respirator before performing tasks such as, but not limited to, spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3315.00 · Current $2321.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1073P125

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  Establishment:  On or about June 8, 2022, the employer had not provided effective training on hazardous chemicals for employees performing tasks such as (but not limited to) spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2320.5
  • — Z (S) $3315

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3315.00 · Current $2321.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1073P125

29 CFR  1926.95(a):Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided.  Jobsite:  On or about June 8, 2022, the employer did not provide appropriate chemical resistant gloves to the employee performing tasks such as, but not limited to, spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2320.5
  • — Z (S) $3315

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1073P125

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee use appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors or potentially injurious light radiation.  Jobsite: On or about June 8, 2022, the employees were not provided with safety glasses for tasks such as, but not limited to, spraying foam insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346126618.