Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DIECKS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DIECKS, INC. in 516 GRANT AVENUE, CLAY CENTER, KS 67432 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 346154495.

Watch Diecks, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Diecks, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DIECKS, INC.
Site address
516 GRANT AVENUE
City
CLAY CENTER
State
KS
ZIP
67432
Mailing
516 GRANT AVENUE, CLAY CENTER, KS 67432
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311612
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $10151.00 · Current $6091.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  In the Main Plant, employee(s) engaged in food production activities were not provided with an eye wash station for flushing of the eyes and for immediate emergency use. Hazardous chemicals used onsite included but were not limited to warewashing detergent and high foam degreaser, which are corrosive.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6090.6
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5801.00 · Current $3481.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  In the Main Plant, employee(s) engaged in forklift production activities were exposed to struck by hazards in that the employer did not ensure each operator of a powered industrial truck was competent to operate one through the successful completion of a training and evaluation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3480.6
  • — Z (S) $5801

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $10151.00 · Current $7106.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:   In the Packaging Room, employee(s) engaged in food production / packaging activities were exposed to amputation and laceration hazards in that the Brio Sir-Steak meat tenderizer was not guarded while the machine was being operated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7105.7
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $10151.00 · Current $7106.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(3)(ii):Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  In the Processing Room, employee(s) engaged in food production activities were exposed to amputation and lacerations hazards in that the Hollymatic Hi-Yield 16-5000 vertical band saw did not have an adequate guard as the guard was not properly used allowing approximately 4 inches of exposed blade to be present with the largest cut of meat.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7105.7
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.303 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $10151.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:  In the Electrical Room off of the Boning Room, employee(s) engaged in food production activities were exposed to electrical shock and fire hazards in that there was a circuit breaker without an internal cover to prevent employees from touching the main conductor wires which were active.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5801.00 · Current $5801.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   In the Main Plant, the employer failed to develop a written hazard communication program to describe how the program would be implemented to include proper training, labeling, and the administration of safety data sheets, to address their chemicals such as the hazards of warewashing machine detergent and high foaming degreaser, which are corrosive. The detergents, which can cause dermal allergic reactions if contact with skin is made, and eye damage, if contact with eyes is made while handling the chemical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5801
  • — Z (S) $5801

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5801.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical:  In the Main Plant, the employer did not maintain safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals used, including but not limited to warewashing detergent and high foam degreaser, which are corrosive, which can cause dermal allergic reactions if contact with skin is made, and an eye damage hazard if contact with eyes is made while handling the chemical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5801

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5801.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  In the Main Plant, employee(s) had not been provided effective information and training to recognize, evaluate, and control exposure to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to warewashing detergent and high foam degreaser which are corrosive; detergent and degreaser, which can cause dermal allergic reactions if contact with skin is made, and an eye damage hazard if contact with eyes is made while handling the chemical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5801

1904.32 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1450.00 · Current $870.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.32(a): The employer did not ensure that at the end of the year that entries were complete and accurate; and an annual summary of injuries and illnesses on the OSHA 300 Log was created, certified and posted.   In the Main Plant, the employer did not keep OSHA 300/300A logs for employee injury/illness while employing more than ten employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $870
  • — Z (O) $1450

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7252.00 · Current $4351.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report within 24-hours a work-related incident resulting in in-patient hospitalization, amputation or the loss of an eye.  On August 9, 2022, an employee working at Diecks Inc. DBA Clay Center Locker Plant sustained an amputation to the right index finger. The employer did not report the work-related incident that resulted in an in-patient hospitalization to OSHA within 24 hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4351.2
  • — Z (O) $7252

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346154495.