APPLETON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: JC SUBCONTRACTOR
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JC SUBCONTRACTOR in 3226/3228 N BLUEMOUND ST., APPLETON, WI 54914 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346215171.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JC SUBCONTRACTOR
- Site address
- 3226/3228 N BLUEMOUND ST.
- City
- APPLETON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54914
- Mailing
- 804 THEDFORD RD, SEAGOVILLE, TX 75159
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $349.00 · Current $349.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. The employer failed to provide abatement certification for the citation issued on September 30, 2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $349
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3108.00 · Current $1865.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. On or about September 13, 2022, at location 3226/3228 N Bluemound St, Appleton, Wisconsin: employees were performing residential roofing activities without any form of conventional fall protection while exposed to fall hazards of approximately 15 feet. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1864.8
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. On or about September 13, 2022, at location 3226/3228 N Bluemound St, Appleton, Wisconsin: the employer did not ensure that employees were trained in the recognition of fall hazards and the methods to mitigate those hazards prior to being exposed to fall hazards while conducting roofing work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3108.00 · Current $1865.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. On or about September 13, 2022, at location 3226/3228 N Bluemound St, Appleton, Wisconsin: employees were utilizing a metal extension ladder at the side of the house and were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet as the ladder was used for accessing and egressing the roof from the ground and did not extend three feet above the roof surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1864.8
- — Z (S) $3108
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in WI
MUSCODA, WI—2026-07-10
SCOT INDUSTRIES, INC
FRANKLIN, WI—2026-07-10
EDGE BROADBAND SOLUTIONS LLC
APPLETON, WI—2026-07-10
LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
KIMBERLY, WI—2026-07-10
ENRIQUE RESENDIC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
DYLAN MATTHEW SHELLEY LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346215171.