BATAVIA, OH —
OSHA Inspection: JUAN RIVERA RUIZ
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JUAN RIVERA RUIZ in 2003 COMMONS CIRCLE DRIVE, BATAVIA, OH 45103 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346330335.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JUAN RIVERA RUIZ
- Site address
- 2003 COMMONS CIRCLE DRIVE
- City
- BATAVIA
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45103
- Mailing
- 471 DEWDROP CIRCLE APT A, CINCINNATI, OH 45240
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Accident prevention responsibilities. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers. a) On or about November 7th, 2022 the employer did not ensure that a program for the frequent and regular inspections of the job site and equipment was being completed by a competent person; as a result, a fall protection system was not being utilized and employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 17.5 ft.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4688
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4688.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a) On or about 11/07/2022 the employer did not ensure that employees, installing a new roof at a residential property, were protected from falling by a fall protection system. Employees were exposed to a fall height of 17.5 ft. from the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4688
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in OH
WELLINGTON, OH—2026-07-16
WHIRLAWAY CORPORATION
WAUSEON, OH—2026-07-16
WATSON WELL DRILLING INC.
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
STONEY ACRES BUILDERS LLC
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
GRB ENTERPRISES LLC
CHILLICOTHE, OH—2026-07-15
KENWORTH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346330335.