Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PINEDA BROTHERS ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PINEDA BROTHERS ROOFING in 112 CORPORATE DRIVE, MIDLAND, TX 79705 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346348972.

Watch Pineda Brothers Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pineda Brothers Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
112 CORPORATE DRIVE
City
MIDLAND
State
TX
ZIP
79705
Mailing
6515 MEADOW RIDGE CIR, NEVADA, TX 75173
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1865.00 · Current $1865.00
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.   Employees engaged in roof decking activities were exposed to struck by hazards from not being provided head protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1865

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1865.00 · Current $1865.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  Employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1865

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1865.00 · Current $1865.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(13): The top or step of a stepladder was used as a step:   Employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet as the employer failed to ensure the top step of the ladder was not used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1865

1926.503 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(2):The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii)  Employees engaged in roofing operations were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet as the employer failed to provide training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1060 A01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.1060(a)(1)(iii):The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders and/or stairways had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling the ladders and/or stairways:  Employees engaged roofing operations were not provided training by the employer in use of ladders, exposing them to fall hazards in excess of six feet..
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346348972.