Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TIMOTHY MITCHELL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TIMOTHY MITCHELL in 4302 WINDEMERE CT., BATAVIA, OH 45103 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346374192.

Watch Timothy Mitchell — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Timothy Mitchell is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TIMOTHY MITCHELL
Site address
4302 WINDEMERE CT.
City
BATAVIA
State
OH
ZIP
45103
Mailing
2 ROCKWOOD DR., AMELIA, OH 45102
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2):Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.  A.) On December 6, 2022, the employer did not conduct an adequate site inspection in that employees were working on the roof of a residential structure without an adequate type of  fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4688
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  A.) On December 6, 2022, employees were roofing a residential structure while not utilizing adequate fall protection systems. The potential fall height was measured to be 12' to the ground and the roof pitch was 6/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4688

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346374192.