HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: CHI ST. LUKE'S HEALTH BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE MEDICAL CENTER
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CHI ST. LUKE'S HEALTH BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE MEDICAL CENTER in 1101 BATES AVENUE, HOUSTON, TX 77030 (NAICS 622110). OSHA activity number 346574395.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Site address
- 1101 BATES AVENUE
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77030
- Mailing
- 1101 BATES AVENUE, HOUSTON, TX 77030
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 622110
- Employees
- 3589
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $11162.00 · Current $5581.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, employees required to wear N95 respirators for protection from airborne biologicals were not provided with a medical evaluation, exposing employees to physiological hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $11162.00 · Current $5581.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, employees required to wear Halyard Health Inc. and Progear N95 particulate filter respirators for protection from airborne biologicals were not fit-tested, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11162.00 · Current $5581.00 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(c)(2): The employer did not assure that no employee was exposed to an airborne concentration of formaldehyde which exceeded two parts formaldehyde per million parts of air (2 ppm) as a 15-minute STEL: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not assure that employees were not exposed to an airborne concentration of formaldehyde exceeding two parts formaldehyde per million parts of air (2 ppm) as a 15-minute STEL.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 D02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11162.00 · Current $5581.00 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(2)(ii): The initial monitoring process was not repeated each time there was a change in production, equipment, process, personnel, or control measures which could have resulted in new or additional exposure to formaldehyde: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, the initial monitoring process was not repeated each time there was a change in production, equipment, process, personnel, or control measures which could result in new or additional exposure to formaldehyde, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 D02 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11162.00 · Current $5581.00 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(2)(iii): The employer received reports of signs or symptoms of respiratory or dermal conditions associated with formaldehyde exposure and the employer did not promptly monitor the affected employee's exposure: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, when the employer received reports of signs and symptoms of respiratory conditions associated with formaldehyde exposure, the employer did not promptly monitor the affected employees' exposures, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 F01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11162.00 · Current $5581.00 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(f)(1): Engineering controls and work practices were not instituted to reduce and maintain employee exposures to formaldehyde at or below the TWA and the STEL: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, engineering controls were not maintained to keep employee exposures to formaldehyde at or below the STEL, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 G01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11162.00 · Current $5581.00 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(g)(1)(i): The employer did not provide required respirators and ensure their use by employees during the interval necessary to install or implement feasible engineering and work practice controls: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, respirators were not used during periods necessary to install and repair the engineering controls, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 H01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $15625.00 · Current $7813.00 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(h)(1)(i): All contact of the eyes and skin with liquids containing 1 percent or more formaldehyde was not prevented by the use of chemical protective clothing made of material impervious to formaldehyde and the use of other personal protective equipment such as goggles and face shields, as appropriate to the operation: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, employees working with formalin did not use goggles and face shields, exposing employees to contact hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $7812.5
- — C (S) $15625
- — Z (S) $15625
1910.1048 L01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11162.00 · Current $5581.00 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(l)(1)(i): The employer did not institute medical surveillance programs for all employees exposed to formaldehyde at concentrations at or exceeding the action level or exceeding the STEL: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not institute medical surveillance programs for all employees exposed to formaldehyde at concentrations exceeding the STEL, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 N03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11162.00 · Current $5581.00 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(3): The training program did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(3)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(3)(vii): a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, the training program did not include a discussion of 29 CFR 1910.1048; a discussion of the contents of the Safety Data Sheet for formaldehyde; the purpose for and a description of the medical surveillance program required by 29 CFR 1910.1048, including a description of the potential health hazards associated with exposure to formaldehyde and a description of the signs and symptoms of exposure to formaldehyde and instructions to immediately report to the employer the development of any adverse signs or symptoms that the employee suspects is attributable to formaldehyde exposure; an explanation of the safe work practices appropriate for limiting exposure to formaldehyde for each job; the purpose for, proper use of, and limitations of personal protective equipment; instructions for the handling of spills, emergencies, and clean-up procedures; an explanation of the importance of engineering and work practice controls for employee protection and necessary instruction in the use of these controls; and a review of emergency procedures including the specific duties or assignments of each employee in the event of an emergency, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 D06
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1253.00 · Current $627.00 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(6): Employees were not notified within 15 working days of receiving the results of exposure monitoring of formaldehyde, in writing, either by distributing copies of the results to the employees or by posting the results: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, employees who had been monitoring for formaldehyde exposure had not been notified, in writing, of the results within 15 working days, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $626.5
- — C (O) $1253
- — Z (O) $1253
1910.1048 O01 VI
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1253.00 · Current $627.00 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(o)(1)(vi): The record of all measurements taken to monitor employee exposure to formaldehyde did not include the names, job classifications, social security numbers, and exposure estimates of the employees whose exposures were represented by the actual monitoring results: a) In the Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16,2023 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not include the name of the employee whose exposure was represented by the actual monitoring results.
Recent events (3)
- — D (O) $626.5
- — C (O) $1253
- — Z (O) $1253
1910.1048 O06 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1253.00 · Current $627.00 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(o)(6)(i): The employer did not upon request make all records maintained as a requirement of 29 CFR 1910.1048 available for examination and copying to the Assistant Secretary and the Director: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not make employee formaldehyde exposure records available to OSHA upon request.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $626.5
- — C (O) $1253
- — Z (O) $1253
More inspections at CHI ST. LUKE'S HEALTH BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE MEDICAL CENTER
HOUSTON, TX—2015-12-08 00:00:00
CHI ST. LUKE'S HEALTH BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE MEDICAL CENTER
View CHI ST. LUKE'S HEALTH BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE MEDICAL CENTER's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 622110)
NORWALK, CA—2026-07-10
CPH HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
ANTIOCH, CA—2026-07-10
SUTTER DELTA MEDICAL CENTER
BURBANK, CA—2026-07-07
PROVIDENCE SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL
LYNDON, KY—2026-07-06
69277 - NORTON HOSPITALS INC
LOUISVILLE, KY—2026-07-02
69268 - UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER INC
More inspections in TX
SPRING, TX—2026-07-10
DORSTENER WIRE TECH INC.
FORT WORTH, TX—2026-07-10
RC PROFESSIONAL ROOFING OF TEXAS LLC
CYPRESS, TX—2026-07-10
FEDERICO CARVAJAL GARCIA
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-10
ED LONG'S METAL WORKS
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-09
WAREHOUSE RACK COMPANY, LP
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346574395.