Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DAVID CHILEL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAVID CHILEL in 5306 BROUGHAM LN, LIBERTY TOWNSHP, OH 45069 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346580186.

Watch David Chilel — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for David Chilel is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAVID CHILEL
Site address
5306 BROUGHAM LN
City
LIBERTY TOWNSHP
State
OH
ZIP
45069
Mailing
12058 CHESTERDALE DR, CINCINNATI, OH 45246
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): Accident prevention responsibilities. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.  a) a) On or about March 21, 2023, the employer did not ensure that adequate frequent and regular inspections were conducted to ensure that fall protection was being utilized by each employee exposed to a fall height greater than 22' while work was being conducted on a 12-12 pitch roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a) ) On or about March 21, 2023, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 22 ft while performing roofing work on a 12-12 pitch residential roof without adequate means of conventional fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346580186.