Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ENRIQUE AMADOR

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ENRIQUE AMADOR in 169 BAIRD ROAD LOT 35 &36, SANTA ROSA BEACH, FL 32459 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346599855.

Watch Enrique Amador — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Enrique Amador is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ENRIQUE AMADOR
Site address
169 BAIRD ROAD LOT 35 &36
City
SANTA ROSA BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32459
Mailing
108 DON BISHOP RD., SANTA ROSA BEACH, FL 32459
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2679.00 · Current $2679.00
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):  The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.  a)  At 169 Baird Road, Lots 35 & 36, Santa Rosa Beach, Florida:  On March 30, 2023; the employer allowed his employee to operate pneumatic nail guns without eye protection while performing framing activities exposing his employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2679

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide:   a)  At 169 Baird Road, Lots 35 & 36, Santa Rosa Beach, Florida:  On March 30, 2023; the employer allowed his employee to work from a job made scaffold with a work platform that measured only 13 inches wide and not 18 inches wide as required by the standard exposing his employee to a fall hazard of up to 25 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1):Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  a)  At 169 Baird Road, Lots 35 & 36, Santa Rosa Beach, Florida:  On March 30, 2023; the employer allowed his employee to work from a job made scaffold without fall protection exposing his employee to a fall hazard of up to 25 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  a)  At 169 Baird Road, Lots 35 & 36, Santa Rosa Beach, Florida:  On March 30, 2023; the employer allowed his employee to work from a job made scaffold without first training his employee on the hazards associated with scaffolds to include erecting and inspecting scaffolding exposing his employee to a fall hazard of up to 25 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a)  At 169 Baird Road, Lots 35 & 36, Santa Rosa Beach, Florida:  On March 30, 2023; the employer allowed his employees to perform framing activities  without first ensuring his employees were trained on the hazards associated with falls to include but not limited to setting u and inspecting fall protection exposing his employee to a fall hazard of up to 25 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a)  At 169 Baird Road, Lots 35 & 36, Santa Rosa Beach, Florida:  On March 30, 2023; the employer allowed his employees to perform framing activities  without fall protection exposing his employee to a fall hazard of 19 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346599855.