Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BERTIN AMADOR

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BERTIN AMADOR in 5112 ELK RIDGE DR., DENTON, TX 76206 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346624133.

Watch Bertin Amador — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bertin Amador is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BERTIN AMADOR
Site address
5112 ELK RIDGE DR.
City
DENTON
State
TX
ZIP
76206
Mailing
5351 PETERSON LN. APT 304, DALLAS, TX 75240
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2679.00 · Current $2679.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  On April 10, 2023, employees engaged in framing activities without fall protection were exposed to unprotected fall hazards of approximately 9 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2679

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2009.00 · Current $2009.00
29 CFR  1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided.  On April 10, 2023, the employer did not provide an extension ladder where employees could access and egress the residential building upper levels, exposing them to potential fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2009

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   On April 10, 2023, employees cutting and installing framing material work below other employees were not wearing hardhats and exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.102 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   On April 10, 2023, employees engaged in framing activities use pneumatic nail guns without wearing eye protection were expose to struck-by hazards and eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.404 F06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
29 CFR  1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous.   On April 10, 2023, employees engaged in framing activities utilized an extension cord with missing ground pin to energize Makita skill saw exposing them to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.416 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
29 CFR  1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used.   On April 10, 2023, employees performing framing work utilized an extension cord with the outer sheathing split exposing internal wiring. The employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   On the residential construction site, the employer did not develop or provide fall protection training to the employees engaged in framing work on how to recognize and eliminate hazards such as fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346624133.