DENTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: BERTIN AMADOR
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BERTIN AMADOR in 5112 ELK RIDGE DR., DENTON, TX 76206 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346624133.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BERTIN AMADOR
- Site address
- 5112 ELK RIDGE DR.
- City
- DENTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76206
- Mailing
- 5351 PETERSON LN. APT 304, DALLAS, TX 75240
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2679.00 · Current $2679.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). On April 10, 2023, employees engaged in framing activities without fall protection were exposed to unprotected fall hazards of approximately 9 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2009.00 · Current $2009.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided. On April 10, 2023, the employer did not provide an extension ladder where employees could access and egress the residential building upper levels, exposing them to potential fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2009
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On April 10, 2023, employees cutting and installing framing material work below other employees were not wearing hardhats and exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: On April 10, 2023, employees engaged in framing activities use pneumatic nail guns without wearing eye protection were expose to struck-by hazards and eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous. On April 10, 2023, employees engaged in framing activities utilized an extension cord with missing ground pin to energize Makita skill saw exposing them to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used. On April 10, 2023, employees performing framing work utilized an extension cord with the outer sheathing split exposing internal wiring. The employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On the residential construction site, the employer did not develop or provide fall protection training to the employees engaged in framing work on how to recognize and eliminate hazards such as fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
ENCINITAS, CA—2026-07-13
LOU RIDDLE CONSTRUCTION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-10
IDAHO HOMES CONSTRUCTION LLC
KIMBERLY, WI—2026-07-10
ENRIQUE RESENDIC
METTER, GA—2026-07-10
M.A.P.C CONSTRUCTION, LLC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
RAMIREZ HOME BUILDERS LLC
More inspections in TX
SPRING, TX—2026-07-10
DORSTENER WIRE TECH INC.
FORT WORTH, TX—2026-07-10
RC PROFESSIONAL ROOFING OF TEXAS LLC
CYPRESS, TX—2026-07-10
FEDERICO CARVAJAL GARCIA
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-10
ED LONG'S METAL WORKS
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-09
WAREHOUSE RACK COMPANY, LP
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346624133.