Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CELA CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CELA CONSTRUCTION in 117 HUSSET ST, SOUTH PORTLAND, ME 04106 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346704091.

Watch Cela Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cela Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CELA CONSTRUCTION
Site address
117 HUSSET ST
City
SOUTH PORTLAND
State
ME
ZIP
04106
Mailing
969 MIDDLESEX ST, LOWELL, MA 01851
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $388.00 · Current $388.00
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated.  South Portland, Maine - The Employer did not certify abatement for Citation 1 Item 4.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $388.00 · Current $388.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  South Portland, Maine - The employer failed to provide abatement documentation  for Citation 1 Item 4.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:  117 Husset St, South Portland, ME - The employer did not ensure that employees were not exposed to falls, as well as possible collapse hazards while employees were using the a material hoist as a ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities at a height of 15 feet from the eve to 22 feet at the peak were not protected by the use of an acceptable fall protection system as laid out in 29 CFR 1926.501:  117 Husset St, South Portland, Maine - The employer did not ensure that all employees working on a residential roof was protected by an acceptable means of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d):The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system:  117 Husset St, South Portland, Maine - The employer did not ensure that employees were not using body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system at heights above 6  feet for roofing work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 8 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Establishment - The employer did not provide a training program for employees potentially exposed to fall hazards over six feet in height conducting roofing work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  117 Husset St, South Portland, Maine - The employer did not ensure that portable ladders being used to access an upper landing surface extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346704091.