Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: NELSON RUIZ

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NELSON RUIZ in 314 MAIN STREET, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346719628.

Watch Nelson Ruiz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nelson Ruiz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NELSON RUIZ
Site address
314 MAIN STREET
City
WALLINGFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06492
Mailing
70 CORNELL STREET, SHELTON, CT 06484
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $376.00 · Current $376.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   Location: 314 Main Street,  Wallingford, Connecticut  Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 2b; Citation 001, Item 03a and Citation 001, Item 03b with a final order date of  8/9/2023 was not received within 10 calendar days (by  8/7/2023)      following the abatement due date (7/27/2023).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  Worksite: On or about May 23, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to use pneumatic nail guns while installing roofing shingles were provided with eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  Worksite: On or about May 23, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the steep roof of a commercial building, approximately 8 feet 10 inches from the ground, were provided with and required to use fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: On or about May 23, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the steep roof of a commercial building, installing new roofing shingles were trained in fall hazards and how to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper-level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  Worksite: On or about May 23, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to gain access to the roof using an extension ladder at a height of approximately 8 feet 10 inches was extended three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: On or about May 23, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employee who was required to use an extension ladder was trained in the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346719628.