Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CALISTA CABINETS INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CALISTA CABINETS INC. in 4180 116TH TERRACE NORTH, CLEARWATER, FL 33762 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 346762602.

Watch Calista Cabinets INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Calista Cabinets INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4180 116TH TERRACE NORTH
City
CLEARWATER
State
FL
ZIP
33762
Mailing
4180 116TH TERRACE NORTH, CLEARWATER, FL 33762
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 H12

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2679.00 · Current $1607.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(h)(12): Fire protection. All areas used for spraying, including the interior of the booth, were not protected by an automatic sprinklers or other approved automatic extinguishing equipment.  a) On or about June 12, 2023, in the spray booth, the employer did not ensure that the interior of the booth was protected with automatic sprinklers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1607.4
  • — Z (S) $2679

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) On or about June 12, 2023, in the spray booth, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program which covered employees required to wear 3M half-faced respirators with dual organic vapor cartridges while performing spray operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) On or about June 12, 2023, in the spray booth, the employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees required to wear 3M half-faced respirators with dual organic vapor cartridges while performing spray operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) On or about June 12, 2023, in the spray booth, the employer did not provide fit testing for employees required to wear 3M half-faced respirators with dual organic vapor cartridges while performing spray operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $376.00 · Current $226.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust:   a) On or about June 12, 2023, on the table outside the spray booth, the employer did not ensure employees required to wear 3M half-faced respirators with dual organic vapor cartridges were stored to prevent contamination and dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $225.6
  • — Z (O) $376

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346762602.