CORINNA, ME —
OSHA Inspection: ROBERT BERG ENTERPRISES, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ROBERT BERG ENTERPRISES, LLC in 852 DEXTER ROAD, CORINNA, ME 04928 (NAICS 448190). OSHA activity number 346778467.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROBERT BERG ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Site address
- 852 DEXTER ROAD
- City
- CORINNA
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04928
- Mailing
- 852 DEXTER ROAD, CORINNA, ME 04928
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 448190
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4465.00 · Current $2233.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Printshop - The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2232.5
- — Z (S) $4465
1910.134 D01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability: Printshop's Screen Wash Station - Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on respiratory hazard(s), in that an employee was using a N95 filtering-facepiece respirator for use with gases and vapors, which is not designed to protect for these applications.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Printshop - The employer did not provide medical evaluations to determine if employees are able to use a respirator prior to issuing them respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): Paintshop - The employer did not ensure that employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators passed an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals: Printshop - Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide annual respirator training to employees who are required to use a respirator in the workplace: Printshop - The employer did not provide respirator training annually, and/or more often if necessary, when employees are required to use a respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4465.00 · Current $2233.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Paintshop - The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at a written hazard communication program which describes how elements (f), (g), and (h) will be met.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2232.5
- — Z (S) $4465
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): The employer did not ensure that container(s) of hazardous chemicals in the workplace were labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: Printshop - The employer did not ensure that all hazardous chemicals were labeled or tagged with identifiers that at least showed general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals being used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: Printshop - The employer did not have safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical used at work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv): Printshop - The hazard communication training did not include the safety and health requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 G01 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii):The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage: Mail Area Staging - A cart was stored in front of the electrical panel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 448190)
DANVILLE, VA—2026-06-12
GENESCO, INC.
ELK GROVE, CA—2026-05-27
GOODWILL
WOOSTER, OH—2026-04-01
THE CLOTHING WAREHOUSE
DE WITT, NY—2026-03-09
BURLINGTON STORES INC.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA—2026-02-24
ST. JOHN KNITS INC
More inspections in ME
PORTLAND, ME—2026-07-06
NEW ENGLAND REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF PORTLAND
DOVER FOXCROFT, ME—2026-07-06
SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS
GORHAM, ME—2026-07-02
TOWN OF GORHAM
FARMINGTON, ME—2026-07-02
MCTA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP
FARMINGTON, ME—2026-07-02
JC HOME IMPROVEMENT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346778467.