Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: WAY MARINE DESIGN, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WAY MARINE DESIGN, INC. in 3520 AGRICULTURAL CENTER DRIVE, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL 32092 (NAICS 336612). OSHA activity number 347022451.

Watch WAY Marine Design, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for WAY Marine Design, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3520 AGRICULTURAL CENTER DRIVE
City
SAINT AUGUSTINE
State
FL
ZIP
32092
Mailing
3520 AGRICULTURAL CENTER DRIVE, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL 32092
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336612
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2678.00 · Current $1607.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures in any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer:  a. Shop Area: On or about October 10, 2023 and times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that employees were required to wear a respirator while welding and using chemicals but the employer failed to establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1606.8
  • — Z (S) $2678

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 06892037

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a. Shop Area:  On or about October 10, 2023 and times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that the employer required the use of a respirator by employees without first providing a medical evaluation to determine if the employees were able to wear a respirator or not.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 06892037

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a. Shop Area: On or about October 10, 2023 and times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that employees were required to wear a tight-fitting half-face respirator without first being fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:   a. Shop area:  On or about October 10, 2023 and times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential respiratory hazards, in that employees were required to wear a tight-fitting half-face respirator without first being provided training as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2678.00 · Current $1607.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a. Shop area:  On or about October 10, 2023  and times prior, the employer exposed employees to hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to xylene, phosphoric acid, acetone, toluene and methanol, in that a written hazard communication program was not developed and implemented.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1606.8
  • — Z (S) $2678

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a. Shop area:  On or about October 10, 2023  and times prior, the employer exposed employees to hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to xylene, phosphoric acid, acetone, toluene and methanol without providing effective training on these hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR  1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):   a. Shop Area: On or about October 10, 2023 and times prior, the employer did not perform initial exposure monitoring for chromium (VI) for an employee who welded with stainless steel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347022451.