Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BUTLER DOORS & MORE, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of BUTLER DOORS & MORE, INC. in 5018 BRISTOL INDUSTRIAL WAY, BUFORD, GA 30518 (NAICS 332321). OSHA activity number 347069759.

Watch Butler Doors & More, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Butler Doors & More, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5018 BRISTOL INDUSTRIAL WAY
City
BUFORD
State
GA
ZIP
30518
Mailing
5018 BRISTOL INDUSTRIAL WAY SUITE 209, BUFORD, GA 30518
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332321
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2765.00 · Current $1659.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Production area- On or about October 30, 2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that, the employer did not ensure that employees were medically evaluated prior to initial use of respirators when employees were required to use 3M Half-face respirators while conducting painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1659
  • — Z (S) $2765

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) Production area- On or about October 30, 2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that, the employer did not ensure that employees were fit tested prior to initial use of respirators when employees were required to use 3M Half-face respirators while conducting painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(k):The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  a) Production area - On or about October 30, 2023, and at times prior, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards in that, the employer did not ensure that effective training and information were provided to employees who were required to use 3M Half-face respirators while conducting door painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2765.00 · Current $1659.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  a) Production area- On or about October 30, 2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that, the employer did not ensure that 3M Half-face respirators issued to employees were stored to protect them from material contamination.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1659
  • — Z (S) $2765

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2765.00 · Current $1659.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Production area - On or about October  30, 2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that, employees were not provided with effective information and training when working with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to D200 Waterbase Topcoat for Windows & Doors paint used in the Shop area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1659
  • — Z (S) $2765

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(2):The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  a) Production area- On or about October 30, 2023, and at times prior, the employer failed to ensure that workplace hazard assessment was conducted through a written certification for the hazards associated with door painting operations while employees were working with D200 Waterbase Topcoat for Windows & Doors paint at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347069759.