Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

LITTLETON, CO —

OSHA Inspection: ERGOFLEX SYSTEMS INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ERGOFLEX SYSTEMS INC. in 8207 SOUTHPARK CIRCLE, LITTLETON, CO 80120 (NAICS 337211). OSHA activity number 347077158.

Watch Ergoflex Systems INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ergoflex Systems INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
ERGOFLEX SYSTEMS INC.
Site address
8207 SOUTHPARK CIRCLE
City
LITTLETON
State
CO
ZIP
80120
Mailing
8207 SOUTHPARK CIRCLE, LITTLETON, CO 80120

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
337211
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

Citations

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5288.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.107(b)(2): The interior surfaces of spray booths were not smooth and continuous without edges and otherwise designed to prevent pocketing of residues and facilitate cleaning and washing without injury:  (a) On or before 11/2/2023, the employer did not ensure that the interior of the spray booth was smooth and continuous. The employer had installed egg carton-style foam onto the ceiling of the booth for sound dampening purposes. This condition exposed employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5288

1910.94 C04 III

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.94(c)(4)(iii):  the employer did not ensure that the spray rooms were adequately ventilated so that the atmosphere in the breathing zone of the operator was maintained in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (c)(6)(ii) of this section:  (a) On or before 11/2/2023, the employer did not ensure that the spray booth exhausted to ensure that the atmosphere both inside and outside the spray area was maintained for adequate ventilation. The spray booth exhaust hose was draped over the side of the booth, exhausting into a gap between the booth and an interior wall and no exhaust to the exterior of the building was in place. The spray booth doors were left open during spraying operations. This condition exposed employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 D07

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.107(d)(7): Exhaust ducts were not constructed of steel:  (a) On or before 11/2/2023, the employer did not ensure that the exhaust duct for the spray booth was constructed of steel. The duct was a flexible, non-metallic hose draped over the side of the booth. This condition exposed employees to fire and respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 B03

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.107(b)(3): The floor surface and operator's working area was not covered with a noncombustible material of such character as to facilitate the safe cleaning and removal of residue:  (a) On or before 11/2/2023, the employer did not ensure that the floor of the spray booth was noncombustible. The concrete floor was covered with cardboard which was covered in overspray. This condition exposed employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5122.00 · Current $5122.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  (a) On or before 11/2/2023, the employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards associated with employees spraying Simalfa 321 glue and Jowapur 150.91 glue. Employees are potentially exposed airborne hazards including, but not limited to, particulates, toluene diisocyanate (TDI), acetone, and titanium dioxide. This condition exposed employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5122
  • — Z (S) $5122

1910.132 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5288.00 · Current $5288.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  (a) On or before 11/2/2023, the employer did not ensure that employees spraying glue in a spray booth were wearing protective clothing. The SDS for the spray glue listed the use of protective clothing.  Employees were wearing street clothes with both bare arms and legs to the glue and other chemicals. This condition exposed employees to skin irritation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5288
  • — Z (S) $5288

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337211)

More inspections in CO

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347077158.