Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

PROSPECT, CT —

OSHA Inspection: P I LIQUIDATING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of P I LIQUIDATING, INC. in 32 GRAMAR AVENUE, PROSPECT, CT 06712 (NAICS 326140). OSHA activity number 347112385.

Watch P I Liquidating, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for P I Liquidating, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
P I LIQUIDATING, INC.
Site address
32 GRAMAR AVENUE
City
PROSPECT
State
CT
ZIP
06712
Mailing
32 GRAMAR AVENUE, PROSPECT, CT 06712

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
326140
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

Citations

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 B

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6453.00 · Current $3227.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:  32 Gramar Avenue, Prospect CT: On or about November 17, 2023, the employer did not maintain a written emergency action plan for the employee?s performing tasks in the facility manufacturing and storing large quantities of combustible insulation materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3226.5
  • — Z (S) $6453

1910.39 B

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6453.00 · Current $3227.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.39(b): A fire prevention plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and made available to employees for review:  32 Gramar Avenue, Prospect CT: On or about November 17, 2023, the employer did not keep a fire prevention plan in writing at the workplace where combustible expanded polystyrene foam was produced and stored.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3226.5
  • — Z (S) $6453

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8067.00 · Current $4034.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.178(l)(4)(iii):An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  34 Gramar Avenue, Prospect CT: On or about November 17, 2024, the employer did not provide a performance evaluation within three years of the training date in 2015 for the employee operating the forklift during tasks such as (but not limited to) moving items.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4033.5
  • — Z (S) $8067

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6453.00 · Current $3227.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   32 Gramar Avenue, Prospect CT: On or about April 23, 2024, the employer did not provide the requested written hazard communication program for the workers exposed to expanded polystyrene gases and other gases during tasks such as (but not limited to) hot wire cutting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3226.5
  • — Z (S) $6453

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  32 Gramar Avenue, Prospect CT: On or about November 17, 2023, the employer did not provide training in the health hazards of chemicals for the workers exposed to expanded polystyrene gases and gases during tasks such as (but not limited to) hot wire cutting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  34 Gramar Avenue, Prospect CT: On or about November 17, 2024, the employer did not certify the forklift operator who performed tasks such as (but not limited to) moving items.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326140)

More inspections in CT

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347112385.