OSHA Inspection: MG MORETA CONSTRUCTION

Issued

2024-03-12 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-04-02 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4355.00 · Current $4355.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns.  LOCATION:  66 Harold Street, Boston, MA.  Flat roof section of the home.  SPECIFIC OPERATION:  On November 14, 2023, workers were exposed to struck by hazards from construction materials and tools from overhead work, where the employer did not provide hardhats.

Issued

2024-03-12 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-04-02 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3734.00 · Current $3734.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.  LOCATION:  66 Harold Street, Boston, MA   SPECIFIC OPERATION:  On November 14, 2023, the employer did not provide eye protection to employees were they could be struck by materials stripping  a roof.

Issued

2024-03-12 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-04-02 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4355.00 · Current $4355.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(4)(ii):Each employee on a walking/working surface was not protected from tripping in or stepping into or through holes (including skylights) by covers.  LOCATION:  66 Harold Street, Boston, MA.  On the flat roof  SPECIFIC OPERATION:  On November 14, 2023, the employer exposed the employees to fall hazards by not covering skylights in the work area.

Issued

2024-03-12 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-04-02 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4355.00 · Current $4355.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a)   LOCATION:  66 Harold Street, Boston, MA  SPECIFIC OPERATION:  On November 14, 2023,  the employer exposed the employees to fall hazards were the proper fall protection equipment was not given to employees working at heights of over 20 feet.

Issued

2024-03-12 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-04-02 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4355.00 · Current $4355.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  LOCATION:  66 Harold Street, Boston, MA  SPECIFIC OPERATION:  On November 14, 2023, the employer failed to provide the proper fall protection training to employees working on a roof.