TYLER, TX —
OSHA Inspection: DIAMOND A CUTSTONE, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of DIAMOND A CUTSTONE, LLC in 13822 HIGHWAY 155 SOUTH, TYLER, TX 75703 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 347151748.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DIAMOND A CUTSTONE, LLC
- Site address
- 13822 HIGHWAY 155 SOUTH
- City
- TYLER
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75703
- Mailing
- 13822 HIGHWAY 155 SOUTH, TYLER, TX 75703
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327991
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4610.00 · Current $2766.00 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: (a) In the fabrication building, a fabricator was exposed to noise levels at 79.38% of the permissible 8-hour TWA (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 79.38% is approximately 88.3 dBA. Sampling was performed for 446 minutes during one shift. Zero exposure was assumed for unsampled time. (b) In the fabrication building, a fabricator was exposed to noise levels at 73.71% of the permissible 8-hour TWA (90 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 73.71% is approximately 87.7 dBA. Sampling was performed for 450 minutes during one shift. Zero exposure was assumed for unsampled time.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2766
- — Z (S) $4610
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2765.00 · Current $1659.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: (a) In the fabrication building, employees who fabricated stone products voluntarily wore half-mask, air-purifying, elastomeric facepiece respirators without first being medically evaluated to determine their fitness to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1659
- — Z (S) $2765
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) In the fabrication building, employees who fabricated stone products were required to wear half-mask air-purifying respirators without first being medically evaluated to determine their fitness to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting respirator was fit tested prior to initial use, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, make or model) was used, and at least annually thereafter: (a) In the fabrication building, employees who fabricated stone products were required to wear half-mask air-purifying respirators without first being fit tested.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4610.00 · Current $2766.00 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(1): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(3) of this section: (a) In the fabrication building, the employer did not assess the exposure of each employee, including fabricators and polishers, who were or could have been reasonably expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level during stone product fabrication.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2766
- — Z (S) $4610
1910.1053 F02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: (a) The employer did not establish an exposure control plan that contained at least the following elements: a description of the tasks in the workplace that involve exposure to respirable crystalline silica; a description of the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica for each task; and description of the housekeeping measures used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 I01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(i)(1)(i): The employer shall make medical surveillance available at no cost to the employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who will be occupationally exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level for 30 or more days per year. (a) In the fabrication shop, employees fabricating stone products were exposed to respirable crystalline silica at concentrations greater than the action level of 25 ug/m3, as an 8-hour time-weighted average, and the employer did not make medical surveillance available.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 J01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(j)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained in accordance with the provisions of hazard communication standard (HCS) and paragraph (j)(3) of this section: (a) In the fabrication building, employees who were exposed to respirable crystalline silica were not trained on the contents of the silica standard, 29 CFR 1910.1053, in accordance with paragraph (j)(3).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327991)
EL CAJON, CA—2026-07-16
GRANITE AND MARBLE CONCEPTS INC.
MURFREESBORO, TN—2026-07-16
EUROSTONE LLC
SANTA CLARA, CA—2026-07-15
UNITED MARBLE & GRANITE
RED LION, PA—2026-07-14
FRANK'S MARBLE & GRANITE, LLC.
MODESTO, CA—2026-07-13
EXQUISITE STONE DESIGN
More inspections in TX
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
SAN MARCOS, TX—2026-07-16
CASA MECHANICAL SERVICES, LTD.
CLARKSVILLE, TX—2026-07-15
SEQUOIAS TREE EXPERT LLC
EL PASO, TX—2026-07-15
SURE STEEL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX—2026-07-15
NORTH STAR ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347151748.