Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: K AND M CUSTOM CABINETRY INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of K AND M CUSTOM CABINETRY INC. in 323 9TH AVENUE NORTH, SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 347160616.

Watch K AND M Custom Cabinetry INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for K AND M Custom Cabinetry INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
323 9TH AVENUE NORTH
City
SAFETY HARBOR
State
FL
ZIP
34695
Mailing
3318 WEARS VALLEY RD., SEVIERVILLE, TN 37862
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

19 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E02 II B 2

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4018.00 · Current $4018.00
29 CFR  1910.106(e)(2)(ii)(b)(2): The quantity of Category 2, 3 or 4 flammable liquid located outside of an inside storage room or storage cabinet in a building or in any one fire area of a building exceeded 120 gallons:   a) For the storage of flammable chemicals on the shop floor adjacent to the spray room/booth, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to fire hazards, in that approximately 350 gallons of category 2 flammable liquids were stored in the shop area outside of a flammable storage cabinet or flammable inside storage room.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4018

1910.107 B05 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2679.00 · Current $2679.00
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers:  a) For the spray booth area, as observed on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to fire hazards, in that, there were no automatic sprinklers or other approved automatic fire extinguishment means on  the upstream and downstream sides of the filters. A handheld spraying operation was in place with flammable paints.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2679

1910.107 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2679.00 · Current $2679.00
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(10): 29 CFR 1910.107(b)(10):  Illumination panels did not effectively isolate the spraying area from the area in which the lighting unit is located.   a) For the spray booth area, as observed on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to fire hazards, in that, hard wired LED lighting on the ceiling of the spray area was not protected by illumination panels, nor were the lights explosion proof. Employees hand sprayed flammable paints in the spray area.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2679

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2009.00 · Current $2009.00
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   a) For the paint room/booth, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that, a 3M half-face respirator was required to be worn by employees while spray painting, and the employer did not have a written and implemented respiratory protection program.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2009

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a) For the paint room/booth, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that, a 3M half-face respirator was required to be worn by employees while spray painting, and the employer had not provided a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    a) For the paint room/booth, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that, a 3M half-face respirator was required to be worn by employees while spray painting, and the employer had not ensured that employee(s) required to use the half-face respirator were fit tested.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4018.00 · Current $4018.00
29 CFR  1910.151(c):Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  a) For the chemical storage area adjacent to the spray booth/room, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to corrosive eye and skin hazards, in that, employees used M.L. Campbell Care Catalyst which was an eye and skin corrosive chemical, and no eyewash station and shower were present for suitable drenching or flushing of the eyes and body upon exposure to the corrosive.  b) For the chemical storage area adjacent to the spray booth/room, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to corrosive eye hazards, in that, employees used varnishes and coatings that were corrosive to the eyes, and no eyewash station was present for suitable flushing of the eyes upon exposure to the corrosives.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4018

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2679.00 · Current $2679.00
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).  a) For the cabinet facility/shop, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards, in that, forklift operators had not been trained and evaluated for forklift operation/safety within the last three years.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2679

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a) For the table saw used to cut laminate material on the shop floor, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to cut and amputation hazards, in that, the saw blade was not guarded from incidental contact at a blade height of 1 and 3/4 inches above the table.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
29 CFR  1910.213(c)(1): Circular handfed ripsaw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:  a) For the wood cutting table saw, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to laceration and amputation hazards, in that, employees used the table saw to rip cut wood pieces without any blade guard/hood in place. The blade was used at a height of 1 and 1/4 inches above the saw's table.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1910.213 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.213(c)(2): Handfed circular ripsaw(s) were not furnished with a spreader to prevent material from squeezing the saw or being thrown back on the operator:   a) For the wood cutting table saw, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to laceration and puncture/projectile hazards, in that, employees used the table saw to rip cut wood pieces without a spreader in place to prevent material from being thrown back at operator. The blade was used at a height of 1 and 1/4 inches above the saw's table.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator:   a) For the wood cutting table saw, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to laceration and projectile/puncture hazards, in that, employees used the table saw to rip cut wood pieces without any non kickback fingers/dogs in place to inhibit material from being thrown back towards the operator. The blade was used at a height of 1 and 1/4 inches above the saw's table.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:  a) For the wood cutting table saw, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to laceration and amputation hazards, in that, employees used the table saw to cross cut wood pieces without any blade guard/hood in place. The blade was used at a height of 1 and 1/4 inches above the saw's table.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
29 CFR  1910.242(b):Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:  a) For the spray booth area, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to compressed air hazards and the potential for an embolism, in that, compressed air was used for cleaning at dead front pressures of 61 p.s.i.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4018.00 · Current $4018.00
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   a) For the cabinet shop, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to fire and corrosive contact hazards, in that, employees used hazardous chemicals in the form of varnishes, coatings and catalysts, and a written hazard communication program for chemicals used was not up to date with the chemicals used and implemented.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4018

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):   a) For the cabinet shop, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to fire and corrosive contact hazards, in that, employees used hazardous chemicals in the form of varnishes, coatings and catalysts, and safety data sheets were not present and available for each hazardous chemical used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not provide information to the employees as to the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, and material safety data sheets required by 29 CFR 1910.1200:   a) For the cabinet shop, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to fire and corrosive contact hazards, in that, employees used hazardous chemicals in the form of varnishes, coatings and catalysts, and had not been provided information as to the location and availability of a written hazard communication program and safety data sheets.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 B05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(5)(i): There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained.  a) For the paint spray booth area, on or about 12/13/2023, the paint spray booth/area ventilation was not equipped with any visible gauge, alarm or other device to indicate that the required air speed was maintained.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.107 G07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.107(g)(7):"NO SMOKING" sign(s) in large letters on contrasting color backgrounds were not conspicuously posted at spraying area(s) and paint storage room(s):  For the paint spraying area and storage area, on or about 12/13/2023, the employer exposed employees to potential fire hazards, in that, "No Smoking" signs were not conspicuously posted.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347160616.