OSHA Inspection: JOEL ZAVALA GARCIA CORNICERO

Issued

2024-02-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-03-05 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4148.00 · Current $2489.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a) On or about January 5, 2024, employees were exposed to head injuries where overhead hazard exists by not wearing protective helmets.

Issued

2024-02-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-03-05 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2765.00 · Current $1659.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a) On or about January 5, 2024, employees using a Makita Saw exposing them to eye injuries by not wearing safety glasses  b) On or about January 5, 2024, employees using pneumatic nail guns exposing them to eye injuries by not wearing safety glasses

Issued

2024-02-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-03-05 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4839.00 · Current $2903.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.304(d): Portable, power-driven circular saw(s) were not equipped with a guard above and below the base plate or shoe:  a) On or about January 5, 2024, employees using a Makita saw exposing them to amputation injuries due to not having a guard.

Issued

2024-02-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-03-05 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4839.00 · Current $2903.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   a) On or about January 5, 2024, employees were exposed to  falls to the lower level.