Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SANTE RESTORATION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SANTE RESTORATION, LLC in 100 PETERS ROAD, BLOOMFIELD, CT 06002 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 347210643.

Watch Sante Restoration, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sante Restoration, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
100 PETERS ROAD
City
BLOOMFIELD
State
CT
ZIP
06002
Mailing
100 PETERS ROAD, BLOOMFIELD, CT 06002
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238910
Employees
48
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 D07 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $7835.00 · Current $3144.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(7)(iv): Materials which will react with water were stored in the same room with flammable liquids.  Inside Chemical Storage Room: On or about January 12, 2024, the employer did not prevent the incompatible storage of flammable liquids near hazardous reactive chemicals when the 107 Solvent Spotter, containing a highly flammable chemical 4-Chlorobenzotrifluoride (~60%), was stored in the same inside storage room with an incompatible strong basic solution of potassium hydroxide (~15%) contained in the 356 Fire Star cleaning solution that was stored on the shelf directly above the flammable chemical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3144
  • — Z (S) $7835

1910.1200 D03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(d)(3)(i): Employers evaluating chemicals did not follow the procedures described in Appendices A and B of � 29 CFR 1910.1200 to classify the hazards of the chemicals, including determinations regarding when mixtures of the classified chemicals are covered by 29 CFR 1910.1200:  Inside Chemical Storage Room: On or about January 12, 2024, the employer did not follow the procedures described in Appendices A and B of � 29 CFR 1910.1200 to classify the hazards of the chemicals such as making the appropriate determination when mixtures of classified chemicals were covered by this section. This included, but was not limited to, the classification consideration that was not completed when an incompatible mixture of 268 StainZap solution, a strong oxidizing agent containing sodium carbonate peroxide, and a 357 Industrial Cleaner solution, a strong basic solution containing sodium and ammonium hydroxide, was stored together. The chemicals that had an explosion hazard were not classified as unstable explosives or assigned to their respective hazard division of the six available as indicated in 1910.1200 Appendix B, Physical Criteria (Mandatory).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5876.00 · Current $3144.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:   Facility-wide: On or about September 15, 2023, the employer did not perform a workplace hazard assessment of what level of protection is necessary when handling various hazardous chemicals including but not limited to, Concrobium Mold Stain Remover.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3144
  • — Z (S) $5876

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.138(a): Appropriate hand protection was not used when employee's hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.  Facility-wide: On or about January 12, 2024, the employer failed to base the appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the tasks to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified while employees performed various chemical material handling tasks. Among the tasks performed, employees transferred liquids into secondary containers, cleaned the containers, sanitized building material in the warehouse and while in the field. Of the various chemicals used to accomplish these tasks, at varying durations, the employer failed to distinguish the appropriate hand protection required for specific operations that exposed employees to oxidizing agents and chemicals that were highly corrosive, basic, and/or acidic.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $9795.00 · Current $3144.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1470

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  Facility-wide:  On or about January 12, 2024, where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials such as a hydrogen peroxide-containing Category 1 disinfectant Concrobium Mold Stain Remover that causes serious eye and skin damage, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes or body was not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use when an employee was splashed in the eyes and face:  a) The 16-gallon self-contained eyewash station, last serviced February 17, 2020, was not checked weekly to determine if flushing fluid needed to be changed or supplemented. b) The 16-gallon self-contained eyewash station drench hose, last serviced February 17, 2020, was not inspected annually to determine if flushing fluid needed to be changed or supplemented.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3144
  • — Z (S) $9795

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $5876.00 · Current $3144.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(8):  The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  Facility-wide: On or about January 12, 2024, the employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3144
  • — Z (S) $5876

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Facility-wide: On or about January 12, 2024, employees were not provided with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area while frequently handling hazardous chemicals during cleaning, transferring, and mixing tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals.  Content Storage Area: On or about January 12, 2024, the employer did not ensure that secondary containers used in the warehouse such as the container tagged in black marker "Industrial Cleaner," which was stored under the 55-gallon drums, that did not provide employees with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (v) of this section for labels on shipped containers or  product identifiers and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.4 A

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1728.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent.   Abatement Certification and Documentation is required.  Facility-wide: On or about September 15, 2023, the employer failed to record a work?related fatality, injury or illness case resulting in the general recording criteria contained in 1904.7 such that the medical treatment rendered beyond first aid was not recorded by the employer on or after the employee received medical treatment. An employee received treatment beyond first aid after sustaining an injury to the eye when the employee was splashed in the face with Concrobium Mold Stain Remover, a Category 1 corrosive liquid that caused damage to the eye.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1728

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347210643.