OSHA Inspection: EAST COAST CURE, LLC

Issued

2024-05-15 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2074.00 · Current $1452.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:  Establishment - The employer did not secure three compressed gas cylinders as specified in Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965.

Issued

2024-05-15 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-07-03 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2074.00 · Current $1452.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use.�  Establishment - The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for when full-face respirators were required to be used.

Issued

2024-05-15 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-07-03 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Establishment - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation prior to the employee's use of full-face respirators.

Issued

2024-05-15 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-07-03 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  Establishment - The employer did not ensure that employees wearing full-face respirators had a fit test prior to use.

Issued

2024-05-15 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-07-03 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  Establishment - The employer did not ensure that employees required to wear tight-fitting full-face respirators were free from facial hair that could impede the sealing surface of the respirator.

Issued

2024-05-15 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-07-03 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training, which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  Establishment - The employer did not ensure that employees using full-face respirators had appropriate annual training covering information such as respirator fit, usage, and maintenance prior to use.

Issued

2024-05-15 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2939.00 · Current $2057.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.151(c):Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  Establishment -  The employer did not provide suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use for employees exposed to injurious corrosive materials.

Issued

2024-05-15 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2074.00 · Current $1452.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program that describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Establishment - The employer did not develop a written hazard communication program for the protection of employees from hazardous chemicals, such as SaniDate 5.0, ZeroTol 2.0, and Ethyl Alcohol 200 Proof.

Issued

2024-05-15 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-07-03 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical that they used.  Service Garage - The employer did not have current safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical used, such as SaniDate 5.0, ZeroTol 2.0, and Ethyl Alcohol 200 Proof.

Issued

2024-05-15 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-07-03 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Establishment - Employees were not provided effective information or training prior to the initial work assignment regarding the sections of a safety data sheet, labeling requirements, and pictograms prior to working with hazardous chemicals.

Issued

2024-05-15 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-07-03 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the dates of the hazard assessment, and which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  Establishment - The employer did not provide a sufficient workplace hazard assessment, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment or the person certifying the evaluation for workplace hazards.