HAMILTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: DGO ROOFING LLC
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of DGO ROOFING LLC in 2095 PRINCETON ROAD, HAMILTON, OH 45011 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347263949.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DGO ROOFING LLC
- Site address
- 2095 PRINCETON ROAD
- City
- HAMILTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45011
- Mailing
- 11435 FISHBURG LANE, CINCINNATI, OH 45240
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers. a) On or about February 7, 2024, the employer did not ensure that frequent and regular inspections were being conducted for the jobsite at 2095 Princeton Road, Hamilton, OH 45011. As a result, 10 employees performing roofing activities were exposed to a fall hazard of 17'6" from a lack of fall protection and improper ladder set up.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a) On or about February 7, 2024, the employer failed to ensure that employees performing roofing activities on a residential home were utilizing a fall protection system. As a result, employees were exposed to a fall height measured at 17'6".
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b): Use. The following requirements apply to the use of all ladders, including job-made ladders, except as otherwise indicated: (1) When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. a) On or about February 7, 2024, the employer failed to ensure that the ladder being utilized by employees performing roofing activities to access the roof was extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface. As a result, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 17'6".
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): Certification of training. The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training. a) On or about February 7, 2024, the employer did not ensure that written training records for fall protection were being maintained in that the employer did not have training records for employees working at 2095 Princeton Road, Hamilton, OH 45011.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in OH
WELLINGTON, OH—2026-07-16
WHIRLAWAY CORPORATION
WAUSEON, OH—2026-07-16
WATSON WELL DRILLING INC.
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
STONEY ACRES BUILDERS LLC
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
GRB ENTERPRISES LLC
CHILLICOTHE, OH—2026-07-15
KENWORTH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347263949.