Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BISSWANGER FARMS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BISSWANGER FARMS, INC. in 623 BELLEVIEW ROAD, ETHEL, AR 72048 (NAICS 111998). OSHA activity number 347285652.

Watch Bisswanger Farms, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bisswanger Farms, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
623 BELLEVIEW ROAD
City
ETHEL
State
AR
ZIP
72048
Mailing
403 BISSWANGER ROAD, ETHEL, AR 72048
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
111998
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2074.00 · Current $2074.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a)  On or about February 7, 2024, inside grain bin #3, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear N95 filter facepiece respirators when performing grain storage, cleaning, and drying activities.  b)  On or about February 13, 2024, inside grain bin #4, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear N95 filter facepiece respirators when performing grain storage, cleaning, and drying activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2074

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   a) On or about February 7, 2024, inside grain bin #3, employees required to wear N95 filter facepiece respirators when performing grain storage, cleaning, and drying activities were not provided a medical evaluation.  b) On or about February 13, 2024, inside grain bin #4, employees required to wear N95 filter facepiece respirators when performing grain storage, cleaning, and drying activities were not provided a medical evaluation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) On or about February 7, 2024, inside grain bin #3, employees required to wear N95 filter facepiece respirators when performing grain storage, cleaning, and drying activities were not fit tested prior to initial use.  b) On or about February 13, 2024, inside grain bin #4, employees required to wear N95 filter facepiece respirators when performing grain storage, cleaning, and drying activities were not fit tested prior to initial use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01 I

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator:  a)  On or about February 7, 2024, inside grain bin #3, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear N95 filter facepiece respirators when performing grain storage, cleaning, and drying activities.  b)  On or about February 13, 2024, inside grain bin #4, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear N95 filter facepiece respirators when performing grain storage, cleaning, and drying activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.272 E02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR 1910.272(e)(1)(ii): Current employees, and new employees prior to starting work in the grain handling facility were not trained in the specific procedures and safety practices applicable to their job tasks including but not limited to cleaning procedures for grinding equipment, clearing procedures for choked legs, housekeeping procedures, hot work procedures, preventive maintenance procedures and lock-out/tag-out procedures:   On or about February 7, 2024, inside grain bin #3, employees were performing work activities such as, but not limited to shoveling rice did not receive training on general safety precautions, including recognition and preventive measures for the hazard related to lock-out/tag-out and, bin entry procedures.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1910.272 G01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(i): The employer did not issue a permit for entering bins, silos or tanks in the grain handling facility before the employees entered the bins, silos, or tanks:  On or about February 7, 2024, inside grain bin #3, the employer did not issue an entry permit prior to employees entering the storage bin to perform housekeeping activities such as, but not limited to shoveling rice.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1910.272 G01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(ii):  Prior to entry, all mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, and pneumatic equipment which presented a danger to employees inside grain storage structures in the grain handling facility were not disconnected, locked out and tagged, blocked-off, or otherwise prevented from operating by other equally effective means or methods:  On or about February 7, 2024, inside grain bin #3, employees performing work activities such as, but not limited to shoveling rice did not de-energize the equipment and machinery prior to entering the storage bin.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1910.272 G03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(3): In the grain handling facility an observer, equipped to provide assistance, was not stationed outside the bin, silo, or tank being entered by an employee:   On or about February 13, 2024, inside grain bin #3, employees performing housekeeping activities were not protected from bin entry hazards.  The employer did not keep an observer stationed outside of the grain bin to monitor the entrant.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2765.00 · Current $2765.00
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  On or about February 7, 2024, in the grain bin area, employees were using a Hutchinson portable grain pump that was receiving power from a flexible cord that had the outer insulation pulled from the attachment plug,
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2765

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347285652.