Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: CHAMPION MARINE AND MOTORS LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CHAMPION MARINE AND MOTORS LLC in 2892 GULF TO BAY BLVD, CLEARWATER, FL 33759 (NAICS 423110). OSHA activity number 347386864.

Watch Champion Marine AND Motors LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Champion Marine AND Motors LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2892 GULF TO BAY BLVD
City
CLEARWATER
State
FL
ZIP
33759
Mailing
3218 CRESCENT OAKS BLVD, TARPON SPRINGS, FL 34688
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423110
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2765.00 · Current $2765.00
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) At 2982 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33759;  On or about April 2, 2024, the employer did not develop and implement a written worksite specific respiratory protection program for employees provided and required to use tight-fitting facepiece respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2765

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) At 2982 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33759;  On or about April 2, 2024, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine each employees' ability to use a respirator before requiring use, in that, employees involved cutting, sanding, and grinding fiber glass hulls were provided and required to use tight-fitting facepiece respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) At 2982 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33759;  On or about April 2, 2024, the employer did not provide a  fit test  to determine each employees' ability to use a respirator before requiring use, in that, employees involved cutting, sanding, and grinding fiber glass hulls were provided and required to use tight-fitting facepiece respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  a) At 2982 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33759;  On or about April 2, 2024, tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not protected from damage, contamination, dust, moisture, and were not stored to prevent deformation, in that, a full  face respirator was stored hanging from a shelf.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H03 II A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(3)(ii)(A): Respirator inspections did not include a check of respirator function, tightness of connections, and the condition of the various parts including, but not limited to, the facepiece, head straps, valves, connecting tube, and cartridges, canisters or filters:  a) At 2982 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33759;  On or about April 2, 2024, the employer did not ensure that respirators were inspected before use, in that, the headband retainer of a 3M Half Facepiece Reusable Respirator with OV and P95 was observed with the headband straps snaps deteriorated and unable to fasten to the elastomeric portion of the mask.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii):  a) At 2982 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33759;  On or about April 2, 2024, the employer did not provide training to employees required to wear  tight-fitting facepiece respirators, to employees involved in cutting, sanding, and grinding fiber glass hulls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3687.00 · Current $3687.00

Hazardous substances 2280

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  a) At 2982 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33759;  On or about April 2, 2024, the employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program for employees handling chemical products such as gel coats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3687

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 2280

29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(1):  Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use  a) At 2982 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33759;  On or about April 2, 2024, the employer did maintain safety data sheets for employees handling chemical products such as gel coats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 2280

29 CFR  1910.1200(f)(6)(ii):  Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical  a) At 2982 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33759;  On or about April 2, 2024, the employer did not ensure that chemicals stored in secondary containers, such as, gel coats used in the repair of hulls, were labeled, tagged or marked, with product identifier or words, pictures, symbols or combination thereof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 2280

29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  a) At 2982 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33759;  On or about April 2, 2024, the employer did not provide information and training to employees handling chemical products such as gel coats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

COPART

COPART

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347386864.