Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JOSE LUIS RECENDIZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE LUIS RECENDIZ in 230 INDIAN BAY, SHERWOOD, AR 72120 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347434185.

Watch Jose Luis Recendiz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Luis Recendiz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE LUIS RECENDIZ
Site address
230 INDIAN BAY
City
SHERWOOD
State
AR
ZIP
72120
Mailing
3400 CLOVER HILL LN, BENTON, AR 72015
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):  The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a) On or about February 24, 2025, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for Citation 1, Item 1, issued on September 3, 2024, with an abatement due date of September 27, 2024. b) On or about February 24, 2025, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for Citation 1, Item 2, issued on September 3, 2024, with an abatement due date of September 27, 2024. c) On or about February 24, 2025, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for Citation 1, Item 3, issued on September 3, 2024, with an abatement due date of September 27, 2024. d) On or about February 24, 2025, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for Citation 1, Item 4, issued on September 3, 2024, with an abatement due date of September 27, 2024. e) On or about February 24, 2025, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for Citation 1, Item 5, issued on September 3, 2024, with an abatement due date of September 27, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   On or about February 24, 2025, the employer failed to submit documentation of corrective action for Citation 1, Item 3, issued on September 3, 2024, with an abatement due date of September 27, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  On or about April 23, 2024, on the west side of the building employees were cutting plywood decking on the roof without eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): The employer used forklifts to support scaffold platforms without ensuring that the entire platform was attached to the fork and that the forklift was not moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:  On or about April 23, 2024, on the west side of the building employees were working from a stack of elevated plywood that was not attached to the forks of a telescoping boom lift.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    On or about April 23, 2024, on the west side of the building employees were installing plywood decking on the roof at a height of  6-feet or greater without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:  On or about April 23, 2024, employees performing construction activities were walking by exposed protruding steel such as but not limited to L-hooks in the central building foundation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  On or about April 23, 2024, employees performing wood framing construction activities used a ladder for access to the roof where the side rails extended less than three feet over the edge.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347434185.