OSHA Inspection: PAU'S CONSTRUCTION & EXTERIORS INC

Issued

2024-10-24 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-12-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $388.00 · Current $388.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a)  The employer failed to submit certification of abatement within 10 calendar days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Item 2.

Issued

2024-10-24 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-12-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a)  The employer failed to submit documentation of abatement within 10 days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Item 1.

Issued

2024-06-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-06-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2):  The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person (i.e., a person who is capable of identifying exist):  On or about April  24, 2024, the employer did not ensure that there were frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite, materials and equipment, such as inspections of ladders and inspections of the utilization of fall protection, in that the foreman had not inspected the job site on the day of inspection, nor had designated a competent person.

Issued

2024-06-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2024-06-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2074.00 · Current $2074.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):  The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying objects while using a nail gun.  On or about April 24, 2024, one roofer engaged with shingling on a residential roof was observed utilizing a pneumatic nail machine without eye or face protection. The worker was not protected from flying particles and/or nails exposing the employee to eye injuries and injuries/illnesses associated with flying particles and/or nails.

Issued

2024-06-06 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  On or about April 24, 2024, multiple employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 20 feet without fall protection, while installing shingles on the roof of the residential home.

Issued

2024-06-06 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  On or about April 24, 2024, the employer did not ensure the extension ladders exceeded 3 feet past the landing for employees utilizing the extension ladder to gain access the top of the residential roof.

Issued

2024-06-06 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(4):Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:  On or about April 24, 2024, the employer did not ensure ladders on site were used for the purpose they were designed for. The employer did not ensure that the A frame ladder on the roof was used for the purpose it was designed for.