Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JJZ CONSTRUCTION INC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JJZ CONSTRUCTION INC in 145 TAYLOR STREET, MANCHESTER, NH 03103 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347445165.

Watch JJZ Construction INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JJZ Construction INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
145 TAYLOR STREET
City
MANCHESTER
State
NH
ZIP
03103
Mailing
15 GROVER STREET APT 2, LYNN, MA 01902
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $388.00 · Current $388.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No.1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 1c, 2, 3, & 5 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent June 24, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $388.00 · Current $388.00
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 4 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent June 24, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  Site- The employer did not develop a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to falls between approximately 10 and 18 feet from the roof of the residence, entryway, and garage.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site- The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to falls between approximately 10 and 18 feet from the roof of the residence, entryway, and garage.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:   Site- Employees were not protected from over head struck by injuries where the employer did not require the wearing of head protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where the employer did not require employees to wear eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  Site- Employees working from the roof of the residence, garage, and entry way were not protected from falls between approximately 10 and 18 feet where fall protection was not required to used by the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder to access the roof of the residence were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder did not extend three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347445165.