Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PICON CONSTRUCTION CORP

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PICON CONSTRUCTION CORP in 35 SALEM ROAD, PROSPECT, CT 06712 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347476103.

Watch Picon Construction Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Picon Construction Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
35 SALEM ROAD
City
PROSPECT
State
CT
ZIP
06712
Mailing
181 HOLLIS STREET #1, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01702
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   Location:  35 Salem Road, Prospect, Connecticut  Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 01b; Citation 001, Item 01c and Citation 001, Item 02c with a final order date of 10/9/2024 was not received within 10 calendar days (by 10/20/2024) following the abatement due date (10/10/2024).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.  Jobsite: On or about May 13, 2024, the employer did not ensure that a supervisor and an employee utilized personal fall protection while installing a metal roof approximately 7 feet, 8 inches from ground level on a residential home.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  Company: On or about May 13, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees installing metal roof components to a residential home approximately 7 feet, 8 inches from ground level were trained to recognize fall hazards and the steps necessary to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 K04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(4): The implementation of the fall protection plan was not under the supervision of a competent person.  Worksite: On or about May 13, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees installing metal roof components to a residential home approximately 7 feet, 8 inches from ground level had a fall protection plan implemented and supervised by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.  Front of house: On or about May 13, 2024, the employer did not ensure that a 24-foot extension ladder set up for roof access had the side rails extended at least  three feet past the roofline which measured approximately 7 feet, 8 inches from ground level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.  Front of House: On or about May 13, 2024, the employer did not ensure that two extension ladders used to access a roof approximately 7 feet, 8 inches from ground level while installing metal roof components were placed with the horizontal distance from the top support approximately one-quarter the working length.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  Company: On or about May 13, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees using extension ladders to access a roof on a residential home approximately 7 feet, 8 inches from ground level were trained to recognize hazards associated with using ladders and the steps necessary to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347476103.