TEANECK, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: SUYA HOME IMPROVEMENT, INC.
Special Programs inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a special Programs health inspection of SUYA HOME IMPROVEMENT, INC. in 245 ELM AVE., TEANECK, NJ 07666 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347488215.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUYA HOME IMPROVEMENT, INC.
- Site address
- 245 ELM AVE.
- City
- TEANECK
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07666
- Mailing
- 106 PULASKI STREET, NEWARK, NJ 07105
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Special Programs (K)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Single-Family Frame Home (Exterior Front): Employees engaged in the removal of roofing shingles, were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 16 feet above the ground surface, on a 16 on 12 pitch roof. Employees were not protected by a personal fall arrest system, or other means of fall protection. The employer did not provide a personal fall arrest system, or other means of fall protection for employees exposed to a working height greater than 6 feet above the ground surface, on or about 5/17/24. b) Single-Family Frame Home (Exterior North Side): Employees engaged in the removal of roofing shingles, were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 16 feet above the ground surface, on a 16 on 12 pitch roof. Employees were not protected by appropriate fall protection. Employees were using a body belt in lieu of a personal fall arrest system. The employer did not provide a personal fall arrest system, or other means of fall protection for employees exposed to working heights greater than 6 feet above the ground surface, on or about 5/17/24.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in NJ
FREEHOLD, NJ—2026-07-10
MARIO & SONS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC
FREEHOLD, NJ—2026-07-10
VACCA ROOFING
FREEHOLD, NJ—2026-07-10
SPECTRA PAINTING, INC
FREEHOLD, NJ—2026-07-10
CRAIG'S MASONRY & HARDSCAPE LLC
FREEHOLD, NJ—2026-07-10
GTN CONSTRUCTION INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347488215.