OSHA Inspection: JUAN MAINATO GUAMAN

Issued

2024-05-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2765.00 · Current $1520.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  a)  At or near 346 Larch Ave., Bogota NJ - Ground: Employee without any means of head protection was exposed to struck by hazards, while engaged in roofing activities under other workers, on or about  2/1/2024.

Issued

2024-05-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2765.00 · Current $1520.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying objects while using a nail gun.   a)  At or near 346 Larch Ave., Bogota NJ - Roof: Employees without any means of eye and face protection were exposed to eye and face injury while engaged in roofing activities utilizing pneumatic nail guns, on or about  2/1/2024.

Issued

2024-05-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4839.00 · Current $2660.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    a) At or near346 Larch Ave., Bogota NJ - Roof: Employees without proper means of fall protection and or without any means of fall protection were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 22 feet, while engaged in roofing activities, on or about  2/1/2024.

Issued

2024-05-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4839.00 · Current $2660.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) At or near346 Larch Ave., Bogota NJ - Roof:  Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to approximately 22 foot fall hazard as they utilized an extension ladder that extended approximately 24 inches above the landing at the edge of a 8on12 pitch roof, on or about 2/1/2024