Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PREMIER BASEMENT SOLUTIONS & REMODELING, LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of PREMIER BASEMENT SOLUTIONS & REMODELING, LLC in 63 MEADOWBROOK DRIVE, MERIDEN, CT 06450 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 347582322.

Watch Premier Basement Solutions & Remodeling, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Premier Basement Solutions & Remodeling, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
63 MEADOWBROOK DRIVE
City
MERIDEN
State
CT
ZIP
06450
Mailing
73 TERRY LANE, ROCKY HILL, CT 06067
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2765.00 · Current $1383.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):  A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.   68 Meadowbrook Drive Meriden, CT:  On or about June 27, 2024, the employer had not established and implemented a written respiratory protection program for an employee required to wear an N95 respirator while being exposed to respirable crystalline silica during tasks such as (but not limited to) saw cutting concrete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1382.5
  • — Z (S) $2765

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  68 Meadowbrook Drive Meriden, CT:  On or about June 27, 2024, the employer did not ensure an employee was medically evaluated before wearing an N95 respirator while exposed to respirable crystalline silica during tasks such as (but not limited to) saw cutting concrete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  68 Meadowbrook Drive Meriden, CT:  On or about June 27, 2024, the employer did not fit test an employee required to wear an N95 respirator exposed to respirable crystalline silica while performing tasks such as (but not limited to) saw cutting concrete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii):  68 Meadowbrook Drive Meriden, CT:  On or about June 27, 2024, the employer did not provide effective respirator training to an employee required to wear an N95 respirator while being exposed to respirable crystalline silica during tasks such as (but not limited to) saw cutting concrete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2074.00 · Current $1037.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 13409000

29CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  68 Meadowbrook Drive Meriden, CT:  On or about June 27, 2024, the employer did not provide a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to but not limited to, respirable crystalline silica and gasoline for fueling and operating a circular wet saw to cut concrete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1037
  • — Z (S) $2074

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 13409000

29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  68 Meadowbrook Drive Meriden, CT:  On or about June 27, 2024, the employer did not maintain safety data sheets at the job site where an employee cutting concrete was exposed to silica containing dusts and gasoline.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 13409000

29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  68 Meadowbrook Drive Meriden, CT:  On or about June 27, 2024, the employer did not provide effective hazard communication training on the physical and chemical properties of gasoline and exposure to respirable crystalline silica while fueling and operating a circular saw cutting concrete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $2420.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0560

29 CFR1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employees were not trained on the physical, health, simple asphyxiation, combustible dust, and pyrophoric gas hazards, as well as hazards not otherwise classified of the chemicals in the work area.  68 Meadowbrook Drive Meriden, CT:  On or about June 27, 2024, an employee was operating a hand held internal combustion saw indoors and not provided training on the signs and symptoms of carbon monoxide exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2419.5
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 0560

29 CFR1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  68 Meadowbrook Drive Meriden, CT:  On or about June 27, 2024, the employer did not provide effective training for employees operating a hand-held saw with an internal combustion engine within a partially enclosed space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.55 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $2420.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0560

29 CFR1926.55(b):  Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not implemented to reduce employee exposure(s) to carbon monoxide.  68 Meadowbrook Drive Meriden, CT:  On or about June 27, 2024, an employee was exposed to carbon monoxide while operating a hand-held saw with an internal combustion engine within a partially enclosed space and limited ventilation.  The employer did not provide and maintain adequate ventilation while the saw was in use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2419.5
  • — Z (S) $4839

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347582322.